y-line/>
Santo Armenia
Historical reflections of Physics:
From Archimedes, …,
Einstein till present.
Preface by
Carmelo Vindigni
Translated by
andreacrok
To my family: to my daughter Gabriella, to my son Pietro, to my daughter Marta, who is not a child anymore, and to my wife Marinella.
To Carmelo Vindigni.
1st edition: September 2019
Copyright © 2019 – Santo Armenia
Preface
By CARMELO VINDIGNI
For this forth book, which you as well present as “This is the fourth work of a tetralogy, right now demanded, which gives birth to the pursuit of the Truth”, you sked me to be the author of the Preface once again.
It is with renewed strength and pride that I pursue the task you gave me.
Ausculting your shell, Odysseus, you embarked on your historical adventure to Knowledge. You observed and saw that despite the progress, as a matter of fact, the mistake made by Archimedes, by Stevin and by Galileo due to the lack of instinctive understanding, has been afterwards kept and exacerbated by others: Newton, Lagrange, Einstein and The Scientific Community.
From your ceaseless rowing and digging, culminating in your “new salt march”, may a new scientific confrontation begin and lead to the path of Knowledge, ultimately transcending the millennial mistake of considering the weight of the bodies unalterable.
You have already announced your fifth work, focused on new fronts, and not satisfied with sailing and digging, now you desire to fly, too?
May Dedalus and Prometheus be your companions.
Author’s presentation
This is the fourth work of a tetralogy, right now demanded, which gives birth to the pursuit of the Truth.
The first work is:
GALILEO AND EINSTEIN
Reflections on the general relativity theory
The free fall of bodies
The shape of solid bodies
The second work is:
Archimedes
Reflections on buoyant bodies
The shape of solid bodies
The third work is:
ARCHIMEDES – GALILEO – NEWTON – EINSTEIN
The shape of solid bodies
The shape of fluid-filled containers
Unveiling – Epiphany
The experiments thus present are to be watched on YouTube: Armenia Santo or through the web site www.armeniasanto.it
Introduction
Since the down of time philosophers considered the weight of bodies unalterable.
Euclid based his geometry on the fundamental entities (point, line and plane) and on postulates. One above all: between two points passes one and only one straight line. Geometry is a human construction, non-existing in the natural world.
Archimedes developed his studies in two fields:
1 geometry;
2 nature.
The geometry field includes the evaluation of the perimeter of flat shapes, the evaluation of the surface of flat shapes, the evaluation of the volume of solid shapes, the assessment of the barycentre of flat and solid shapes, etc.
The natural field includes the balance of bodies, the study of the buoyancy phenomenon etc.
Archimedes, confident of the sufficient reason principle or due to a spontaneous knowledge, developed his studies on nature basing it on postulates.
Modern and contemporary Physics (classical, relativistic and quantum), from Galileo till present, despite the definition of being experimental, are still built on postulates based on which theory after theory is constructed.
In this study the millennial mistake will be underline, an error derived from the postulate of considering the weight of bodies unalterable, even though it was outdated by Newton’s universal law of gravity, based on which the weight of bodies changes with their position (variation of distance from the centre of the earth), as a matter of fact it persists and with the passing of time it exacerbates.
This millennial mistake includes at present three of them:
1 - Newton himself considered the weight of bodies unchangeable with their shape;
2 - about forty years ago the Scientific Community established that scales (with equal arms, analogues and digital) do not measure the weight but the mass of bodies;
3 - from the 20th May 2019 the Scientific Community, looking to redefine the fundamental physical quantities, hasn’t established the standard sample nor the fabric or the sizeable shape for the kg mass.
Once the detailed knowledge of Kebble’s Scale (used to redefine the kg per mass) will be spread publicly, it will be known if there is or there isn’t a forth mistake, depending on the regular or the irregular shape of the system (the regular shape is achieved as a mere coincidence and not as a willing choice).
The historical era is divided into three periods:
1 - ancient, from Archimedes to Galileo;
2 - modern, from Newton to Lorànd Eötvös;
3 - contemporary, from Einstein till present.
From the historical research on the present study, news insights emerged:
a) the study of buoyant bodies;
b) the study of hanging/rolling bodies.
Chapter I. General Ideas
.1 Body Weight, gravity weight, mass, gravity law
The concepts of mass and of gravitational
