economic threat to Europe. More recently, the industrial threat posed by the US was replaced by a fear of American dominance in global consumption, through processes such as Coca-Colonization, McDonaldization, and Starbuckization. Apart from the economic realm, the process of Americanization is also evident in Europe, and throughout the world, in such areas as politics, law, military, and culture.
However, this discourse is complicated by other issues, and therefore a more nuanced analysis of Americanization is required. In discussing Americanization, we need to specify the import under consideration. Similarly, the particular form of Americanization – cultural, social, communicative, political, or economic – needs to be specified. While some global processes are traceable to the US, many details of this complicated process would be lost if it was simply subsumed under the heading of Americanization.
The issue becomes more complex when we try to define what counts as Americanization. Does the product or process have to be produced in the US? Or, does it depend on whether it is identified as American by those who import it? It can be argued that the process of Americanization has as much to do with the receiving nation as with the US itself. Receiving nations are not passive entities and they play an active role in shaping the process of Americanization. For instance, many nations have now created their own McDonaldized restaurants, which are then exported back into the US. Anti-Americanism is an intense and non-homogeneous global process, comprising of distinct forms, causes, and expressions.
In contrast to all the other flows, globalization consists of multidirectional flows, with no single point of geographic origin. In addition, while globalization is a decentered process, the others are focused more on nation-states. Globalization generally involves subtler control and hence does not generate the same degree of intense opposition as at least some of the other processes (imperialism, colonialism). Globalization can be said to be the broadest of the processes discussed in this chapter. All of the others either continue to survive in, or are subsumed under, globalization. It could also be argued that, in a sense, most of these processes are past their prime. The current era may then be regarded as an era of the posts – post-imperialism, post-development, postcolonialism, post-Westernization, and post-Americanization.
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1 Is globalization simply another name for processes such as imperialism, colonialism, development, Westernization, and Easternization? Examine the similarities and differences among these processes.
2 Are the processes of Westernization and Easternization comparable in terms of scope and magnitude?
3 Trace the shifting definitions of imperialism. Is it relevant as an analytical tool for the current global age?
4 Is Americanization a relevant concept? What particular aspect of it is most relevant today?
5 Did the Presidency of Donald Trump rendered Americanization an outdated concept? Discuss.
6 What is anti-Americanism and what are its sources? Has it increased or declined over the years?
7 Discuss the concept of the “era of the posts.” What are its advantages and disadvantages for thinking about the world today?
REFERENCES
1 Amin, Samir. 2019. The Liberal Virus: Permanent War and the Americanization of the World. New York: NYU Press.
2 Ashcroft, Bill. 2012a. “Colonialism.” In George Ritzer, ed., Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
3 Ashcroft, Bill. 2012b. “Postcolonialism.” In George Ritzer, ed., Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
4 Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. 1998. Post-Colonial Studies: The Key Concepts. New York: Routledge.
5 Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin, eds. 2006. The Post-Colonial Reader, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
6 Associated Press. 2020. “Europe Stunned by American Coronavirus Response as US Approaches Five Million Infections.” The Telegraph August 9.
7 Beck, Ulrich, Natan Sznaider, and Rainer Winter, eds. 2003. Global America? The Cultural Consequences of Globalization. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
8 Berggren, D. Jason, and Nicol C. Rae. 2007. “George W. Bush, Religion and European Anti-Americanism.” In Brendon O’Connor, ed., Anti-Americanism: History, Causes, and Themes, Vol. 1: Causes and Sources. Oxford: Greenwood World Publishing, pp. 1-18.
9 Blake, Andrew. 2004. “Americanisation and Popular Music in Britain.” In Neil Campbell, Jude Davies, and George McKay, eds., Issues in Americanisation and Culture. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
10 Bozkurt, Umut. 2012. “Westernization.” In George Ritzer, ed., Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
11 Branche, Jerome, ed. 2018. Post/Colonialism and the Pursuit of Freedom in the Black Atlantic. New York: Routledge.
12 Brooks, Andrew. 2017. The End of Development: A Global History of Poverty and Prosperity. London: Zed Books.
13 Bryman, Alan. 2004. The Disneyization of Society. London: Sage.
14 Campbell, Colin. 2007. The Easternization of the West: A Thematic Account of Cultural Change in the Modern Era. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
15 Campbell, Colin. 2012. “Easternization.” In George Ritzer, ed., Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
16 Campbell, Neil. 2003. Landscapes of Americanisation. Derby: University of Derby.
17 Campbell, Neil. 2004. “Landscapes of Americanisation in Britain: Learning from the 1950s.” In Neil Campbell, Jude Daviesand George McKay, eds., Issues in Americanisation and Culture. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
18 Campbell, Neil. 2012. “Americanization.” In George Ritzer, ed., Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
19 Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, and Enzo Faletto. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
20 Ceaser, James. 2003. “A Genealogy of Anti-Americanism.” The Public Interest Summer, 2003.
21 Chilcote, Ronald H.2000. “Introduction.” In Ronald H. Chilcote, ed., Imperialism: Theoretical Directions. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.
22 Ciftci, Sabri, Becky O’Donnell, and Allison Tanner. 2017. “Who Favors al-Qaeda? Anti-Americanism, Religious Outlooks, and Favorable Attitudes toward Terrorist Organizations.” Political Research Quarterly 70 (3): 480–494.
23 Çınar, Menderes. 2018. “From Moderation to De-moderation: Democratic Backsliding of the AKP in Turkey.” In J. Esposito, L. Zubaidah Rahim, and N. Ghobadzadeh, eds., The Politics of Islamism. Diverging Visions and Trajectories. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 127-158.
24 Darcy, Jane. 2004. “The Disneyfication of the European Fairy Tale.” In Neil Campbell, Jude Davies, and George McKay, eds., Issues in Americanisation and Culture. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
25 Dasgupta, Rana. 2018. “The Demise of the Nation State.” The Guardian April 5.
26 de Grazia, Victoria. 2005. Irresistible Empire: America’s Advance
