Handbook of Aggregation-Induced Emission, Volume 1. Группа авторов

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Handbook of Aggregation-Induced Emission, Volume 1 - Группа авторов страница 22

Handbook of Aggregation-Induced Emission, Volume 1 - Группа авторов

Скачать книгу

will undergo ultrafast nonradiative decay so that it is almost nonemissive in the solution. On the contrary, for the TPE‐4oM with the methyl groups substituted at the ortho position of the phenyl rings, there are two notable barriers on both the cyclization and isomerization pathways, connecting the FC region with the cyclization CI and the isomerization CI, respectively. Hence, there is no decay for TPE‐4oM to the ground state of the total 568 trajectories in the TSH simulation for 1 ps, which accounts for its higher emission efficiency in the solution.

      With scanning the PES or simulating by the TSH method, we can find that vigorous molecular motions of the highly flexible AIEgens in the excited state can lead to the CIs between the excited state and the ground state. These CIs will result in enormous nonradiative decay rates or generate another photoinduced product. Furthermore, the crossing between the excited states can also strongly affect the photophysical behaviors of luminogens that will generate the transition forbidden dark states.

      RIM serves as the most effective guideline for the design of AIE molecules. However, RIM requires a more detailed elaboration when it is applied to the heteroatom‐containing AIEgens. On the one hand, the introduction of heteroatoms endows the luminogens versatile functions, whereas, on the other hand, it makes the excited‐state features of the luminogens more complicated. First, introduction of heteroatoms, often, produces the electron‐donating or ‐withdrawing effect, and then facilitates the mixing of the overlap‐forbidden charge‐transfer (CT) state with the local‐excited (LE) state. Second, heteroatoms with lone‐pair electrons can import the crossing between the overlap‐forbidden (n,π*) state with the (π,π*) state. What is more, (n,π*) state will facilitate the intersystem crossing from the singlet states to the triplet states, which are spin forbidden and can be easily quenched. All these overlap‐forbidden and spin‐forbidden states have been defined as dark states that are detrimental to the fluorescence process [19].

Image descirbed by caption.

      Source: Adapted from Ref. [9] with permission from John Wiley and Sons.

      This mechanism can be concluded as the restriction of access to the dark state (RADS), which further elucidates the connotation of the RIM mechanism. The previous investigation mainly focuses on the NAC between the first excited state and the ground state. As an extreme scenario of NAC, the CI can cause ultrafast deactivation. In fact, the PES of multiple excited states can be coupled by molecular motions and arranged in a complicated manner, especially for the heteroatom‐containing molecular systems. The accessible dark states like the CT state, (n,π*) state, and the triplet state will cause the fluorescence quenching. Once the molecular motions that lead to the dark states undergo the intramolecular or environmental constraints, the fluorescence can be restored. The multistate model has been proved effective to evaluate the excited‐state deactivation of the heteroatom‐containing luminogens.

      For classical luminophores, the internal conversions from higher excited states to the lowest excited states are much faster than the luminescence processes due to the rigid structures and large conjugation even in the gas phase or dilute solution, so the light emission always comes from the lowest excited state with a given spin multiplicity [20].

      Qian et al., first, proposed the suppression of Kasha’s rule (SOKR) as the mechanism for the AIE behaviors of molecular rotors based on the boron‐difluorohydrazone (BODIHY) [11a]. The luminescence properties related to higher excited states of the BODIHY derivatives in the solution have been studied through the spectroscopy by changing the viscosity of the solution and varying the excitation wavelength. These derivatives show viscosity‐dependent emission enhancement but nearly no response to the solution polarity due to weak partial charge transfer. According to the calculation at the TDA‐PBE level, the first excited state is designated as a dark state. Instead, the S3 state is a bright state, which is more populated due to the relatively large energy gap between the S3 and lower excited states. It is demonstrated that once the viscosity increases, the rotation of the phenyl rings can be hindered and make the excitons stabilized in the higher excited state to generate enhanced anti‐Kasha emission. However, these results still remain controversial. Zhou et al. have recently employed more DFT functions to recheck the excited‐state properties of the BODIHY derivatives and have challenged the SOKR mechanism [11b]. They have found that the TDA‐PBE method used in Ref. [11a] may not describe the correct order of the excited states, and the energy gaps between S3 and S2 states obtained from this method are small

Скачать книгу