Damaging Effects of Weapons and Ammunition. Igor A. Balagansky

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Damaging Effects of Weapons and Ammunition - Igor A. Balagansky страница 15

Damaging Effects of Weapons and Ammunition - Igor A. Balagansky

Скачать книгу

(μ = 1) with concentrated firing, all ammunition hits the same point, and therefore, the probability of damaging the target with several shots Wn is equal to the probability of damaging with one shot W1:

upper W Subscript n Baseline equals upper W 1 period

      The other extreme case of shooting is independent shots (μ = 0). In this case, the probability of damaging the target with n shots will be

      (I.24)upper W Subscript n Baseline equals 1 minus product Underscript i equals 1 Overscript n Endscripts left-parenthesis 1 minus upper W Subscript i Baseline right-parenthesis comma

      where Wi is the probability of hitting the target with an i‐shot.

      With the equal probability of damaging the target with each of the n independent shots,

      Example

      Five hunters shoot one duck at a time and independently of each other. Each hunter would kill a duck with a probability W1 = 0.2. How likely would all five hunters be to kill a duck?

      Solution

upper W 5 equals 1 minus left-parenthesis 1 minus 0.2 right-parenthesis Superscript 5 Baseline equals 0.672 period

      To calculate the probability of the target damage with dependent shots, the approximate methods of calculation are usually used, in which the dependence of shots is either ignored or taken into account approximately. One of the simplest methods of taking into account the dependence of the shots is to calculate the probability of damaging the target using the approximate formula

      The relative error of determining the probability of damaging the target with this method at nW1 ≈ 0.5–5 does not exceed several percents.

      Example

      One of the hunters from the previous example takes five shots at a duck in a row. The correlation ratio between the shots is μ = 0.5. What's the equal probability of damaging the duck?

      Solution

upper W 5 equals 0.2 plus left-parenthesis 0.672 minus 0.2 right-parenthesis StartRoot 1 minus 0.5 squared EndRoot equals 0.608 period

      The dependence of the shots always leads to a reduced probability of damaging the target compared to the case of independent shots. This effect is more pronounced with more shots fired and a bigger correlation ratio μ. With a small number of shots (n = 2–4) and relatively small correlation ratio values (μ < 0.5), the correction for the dependence of shots is small and the probability of damaging the target can be calculated as in the case of independent shots. If there are a large number of shots and their correlation is significant, correction for the dependence of shots should be taken into account.

      An extremely important issue in efficiency theory is to establish a rational relationship between the group error of firing (Ex0, Ey0) and individual or technical dispersion (Bd, Bs). The optimal characteristics of the individual dispersion must be commensurate with the characteristics of the aiming error (Ex0Вd); (Ey0Вs). Unfortunately, this is not always the case in existing weapon systems; in particular, for artillery weapon systems and small‐caliber unguided aircraft missiles, the group error of firing often far exceeds the individual dispersion.

      The optimal ratio between individual and group firing errors can be achieved either by increasing the aiming accuracy or by increasing the individual dispersion of the ammunition. In the practical case of a firing situation, the effectiveness of the firing was increased by up to five times when the technical dispersion was increased to its optimum value without increasing the aiming accuracy.

      Another way to increase the effectiveness of the dependent shots, which is widely used for ground artillery, is to shoot with an artificial dispersion of the shots, which is achieved by shooting one target at several aiming positions.

      I.3.6 Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Firing on a Group Target

      Most often the task of shooting at a group target is to damage the largest possible number of units in the group. As an indicator of the effectiveness of firing in this case, the average number of damaged units from the group is used.

      (I.27)upper M Subscript d Baseline equals upper M left-bracket upper X Subscript d Baseline right-bracket comma

      where the random value of Xd is the number of units damaged.

Schematic illustration of group target.

      Source:

Скачать книгу