style="font-size:15px;"> Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America, Department of Defense. P. 6; National Security Strategy, December 2017. P. 8; Nuclear Posture Review, Office of the Secretary of Defense. February 2018. P. 23, 33, 34.
110
Missile Defense Review 2019… P. 60.
111
Statement of Thomas H. Harvey III, Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy, Plans, and Capabilities, before the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Strategic Forces. June 7. 2017. P. 11.
112
Erwin S. Pentagon seeking proposals for how to use sensors in space to quickly target enemy missiles // Space News. February 17. 2019.
113
Raytheon: SM-6 Passes Rigorous Graduation Tests // Seapower. April 27. 2017.
114
Expert: Missile Defense Test Result Is No Reason to Expand Program. Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. May 30, 2017; Reif K. Anti-Missile System Destroys ICBM Target // Arms Control Today. July/August 2017.
115
Statement by Robert F. Behler, Director, Operational Test and Evaluation. Office of the Secretary of Defense before the House Strategic Forces Subcommittee. May 8. 2019. P. 6–11.
116
Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy… P. 10, 11. Missile Defense Review 2019… P. XI, XVII, 62.
117
Missile Defense: Delivery Delays Provide Opportunity for Increased Testing to Better Understand Capability. United States Government Accountability Office. June 2019.
118
Karako T., Rumbaugh W. Inflection Point: Missile Defense and Defeat…
119
Криволапов О.О. Концептуальные основы развития ПРО США во время президентства Д. Трампа // Россия и Америка в XXI веке. 2018. Вып. 2: https://rusus.jes.su/s207054760000025-4-1 (дата обращения: 15.09.2018).
120
Karako T., Rumbaugh W. Inflection Point: Missile Defense and Defeat…
121
Ibid.
122
Statement by Lt Gen James H. Dickinson, USASMDC/ARSTRAT Commander, JFCC IMD Commander before the Senate Armed Services Committee, FY 2020 Authorization Request for Missile Defense. April 3. 2019. P. 21.
123
Missile Defense Review 2019… P. 27, 31–32, 36, 47, 77.
124
Криволапов О.О. Концептуальные основы развития ПРО США во время президентства Д. Трампа // Россия и Америка в XXI веке. 2018. Вып. 2: https://rusus.jes.su/s207054760000025-4-1 (дата обращения: 15.09.2018).
125
Криволапов О.О. «Обзор ПРО-2019»: новые черты и подходы // Россия и Америка в XXI веке. 2019. Спец. выпуск: https://rusus.jes.su/s207054760005319-7-1/ (дата обращения 7.06.2019).
126
Judson J. Sharing Missile Defense Intel among US Allies Still a Challenge as Need for Joint Ops Grows // Defense News. 8.08.2018.
127
Missile Defense Review 2019… P. XIX, 44, 76.
128
Ibid. P. XIII, XIX, 76.
129
Ibid. P. 8, 31.
130
Ibid. P. XII, 41.
131
John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, Conference Report to accompany H.R. 5515, July 25, 2018. P. 414, 799–800: https://www.congress.gov/115/crpt/hrpt874/CRPT-115hrpt874.pdf (accessed at: 17.08.2018).
132
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018, Conference Report to accompany H.R. 2010, November 2017. P. 1263–1264. Available at: http://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20171113/HRPT-115-HR2810.pdf (accessed at: 23.11.2017).
133
Батюк В.И. США и военная безопасность Европы: эволюция подходов // Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право. 2019. Т. 12. № 3. С. 193.
