>Nudes
© Parkstone Press International, New York, USA
© Confidential Concepts, Worldwide, USA
© Estate Masson/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/ADAGP, Paris
© Estate Balthus/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/ADAGP, Paris
© Estate Munch/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/BONO
© Estate Bacon/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/DACS London
© Estate Picabia/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA ADAGP, Paris
© Banco de México Diego Rivera & Frida Kahlo Museums Trust
© Estate Man Ray/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/ADAGP, Paris
© Estate Duchamp/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/ADAGP, Paris
© Estate Denis/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/ADAGP, Paris
© Estate Beckmann/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/VG BILD KUNST
© Estate Ernst/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/ADAGP, Paris
© Estate Larionov/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/ADAGP, Paris
© Estate Picasso/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/PICASSO
© Estate Leger/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/ADAGP, Paris
© Estate Bonnard/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/ADAGP, Paris
© Estate Dufy/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/ADAGP, Paris
© Estate Magritte/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/ADAGP, Paris
© Estate Man Ray/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/ADAGP, Paris
© Estate Kingdom of Spain, Gala-Salvador Dalí Foundation/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/VEGAP
© Estate Valadon/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/ADAGP, Paris
© Estate Lempicka/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA
© Estate Wesselmann/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/ADAGP, Paris
© Estate Brauner/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/ADAGP, Paris
© Estate Raysse/Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/ADAGP, Paris
© Fernando Botero/Marlborough Gallery
© Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, Artists Rights Society, New York, USA/Wichtrach, Bern
© Lucian Freud
Foreword
“I wished to suggest by means of a simple nude, a certain long-lost barbaric luxury.”
The Bather of Valpinçon (The Great Bather)
Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, 1808
oil on canvas, 146 × 97.5 cm, Musée du Louvre, Paris
Just as there is a fundamental difference in the use of the words naked and nude, the unclothed body can evoke a feeling of delight or shame, serving as a symbol of contradictory concepts – Beauty and Indecency. This distinction is explored by Kenneth Clark at the beginning of his famous book The Nude. Earlier still, Paul Valéry devoted a special section of his essay on Degas to this subject.
Doryphorus (Spear Carrier)
c. 440 BC
marble copy after a Greek original by Polykleitos
Museo Archeologico Nazionale, Naples
It is that which provides grounds for separating depictions of the nude body as a special genre. Deriving from the Ancient World’s cult of the beautiful body and celebrated by the artists of the Renaissance, the nude became an inseparable element of works belonging to various genres. Here there is a whole range of gradations – from the sanctified nude of Christ in His Passion to the extremely free nakedness of nymphs, satyrs and other mythological figures.
Barberini Faun
c. 200 BC
marble copy after a Hellenic original
h. 215 cm
Glyptotek, Munich
This indicates that for a long time the nude was required to be placed in a subject-genre context, outside of which it was perceived as something shameful. The evolution of European painting provides a good demonstration of how the bounds of the possible were expanded and the degree of aesthetic risk in this region decreased. If the word nude might sound odd when used in reference to the noble bareness of Poussin’s characters, it is entirely acceptable for Boucher’s unclothed figures.
David
Donatello, c. 1430
bronze, h. 185 cm
Museo Nazionale del Bargello, Florence
The relative autonomy in the depictions of the bare body, which can be taken as a sign of the formation of a specific genre, is a fairly late phenomenon. Théodore Géricault’s Study of a Male Model, for example (Pushkin Museum) is of particular value. It is indubitably a preparatory work, a study of the naked body, and its ancillary character is evident, but a view in retrospective changes the meaning and value of depiction, since today we see this model as one of the future characters in the drama acted out on the Raft of the Medusa.
The Birth of Venus
Sandro Botticelli, 1484–1486
tempera on canvas, 180 × 280 cm
Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence
The hand of the twenty-year-old Géricault possesses the power of a genius. The energetic chiaroscuro moulding endows the painting with sculptural qualities, but a superb sense of rhythm harmonizes the illusion of volume with flatness. An expressive contrast to Géricault’s study is provided by Thomas Couture’s Little Bather (The Hermitage Museum). The motivation for the nude is of no fundamental significance (the painting has also been called Girl in a Garden), since the girl incarnates sinless beauty and naïveté.
David
Michelangelo, 1501–1504
marble, h. 410 cm
Galleria
