super alias nations, ergo nec ipse» (Oldradus da Ponte. Consilia. Consilium No. 69. Sig. 24v).
43
Наиболее ранний вариант рассуждений на эту тему принадлежит Андреасу из Исернии (ум. 1316): «Cum causa rex alius poterit in regno suo quod imperator potest in terra imperii… primi domini fuerunt reges, ut dicit Sallustius… pedditae ergo sunt provinciae (quae regem habent) formae pristinae habendi reges, quod facile fit… Liberi reges tantum habent in regnis suis quanum imperator in imperio» (Andreas de Isernia. In usus feodorum commentaria. Lyon, 1579. Sig. 286r).
44
«Where by divers sundrie old auntentike histories and chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed that this Realm of Englond is an Impire, and so hath ben accepted in the worlde, governed by oon supreme heede and King having dignitie and roiall estate of the Imperiall Crowne of the same, unto whom a Body politike, compacte of all sortes and degrees of people… ben bounded and owen to bere next to God a naturall and humble obedience» (An Acte that the Appeles in suche cases as have ben used to be persuit to the See of Rome shall not be from hensforth had ne used but within this Realme (1533: 24Henry VIII, c.12) // Statutes of the Realm. London, 1817. Vol. III. P. 427).
45
Более подробно об этом см.: Ullmann W. This Realm of England is an Empire // Journal of Ecclesiastical History. 1979. Vol. 30. No. 2. P. 175–203.
46
Kantorowicz E. The Kings two bodies: a study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton, 1957; Canning J. Law Sovereignty and Corporation Theory // Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought. 350–1450. Cambridge, 1987. P. 473–477.
47
Хачатурян Н. А. Средневековый корпоративизм и процессы самоорганизации в обществе. Взгляд историка-медиевиста на проблему коллективного субъекта // Власть и общество в Западной Европе в Средние века. С. 31–46.
48
«universitas nil aliud est nisi hominess qui ibi sunt» (Accursius. Glossa Ordinaria // Corpus Juris Civilis. Venice, 1497. Sig. 63v (Ad Dig. 3.4.7)).
49
Об этом подробнее: Canning J. The Corporation in the Political Thought of the Italian Jurists of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries // History of Political Thought. 1980. Vol. I. P. 15–24; Wilks M. The Problem of Sovereignty in the Late Middle Ages. Cambridge, 1963. P. 24.
50
Wolf C. Bartolus of Sassoferrato: His Position in the History of Medieval Political Thought. Cambridge, 1913. P. 156–159.
51
Формула «civitas quae superiorem non recognoscit», определявшая суверенный город-республику, а затем и любое территориальное государство как «sibi princeps» или «vice principis» (Baldus de Ubaldis. Consilia. I–V. Brescia, 1490–1491 (репринт: Roma, 1894). II. No. 49).
52
Baldus de Ubaldis. Lectura super prima et secunda parte digesti veteris. Lyon, 1498 (репринт: Turin, 1987). Ad Dig. I.I.9. Sig. 9r.
53
Meijers E. Etudes d’histoire du droit. 4 vols. Leiden, 1956–1973. Vol. III. P. 156–198.
54
Ohlmeyer J. Seventeenth Century Ireland and the New British and Atlantic Histories // The American Historical Review. 1999. Vol. 104. No. 2. P. 446–462; Percival-Maxwell M. Ireland and the Monarchy in the Early Stuart Multiple Kingdom // The Historical Journal. 1991. Vol. 34. No. 2. P. 279–295; Kingdom United? Great Britain and Ireland since 1500: Integration and Diversity / ed. by S. Connolly. Dublin, 1999.
55
Wormald J. The Creation of British Multiple Kingdoms or Core and Colonies // Transactions of Royal Historical Society. 6th ser. 1992. Vol. 2. P. 175–194.
56
The Statutes at Large, Passed in the Parliament held in Ireland… 1301 to 1800. Dublin, 1786. Vol. 1. P. 176.
57
Edwards R., Moody T. The History of Poynings Law: Part I, 1494–1615 // Irish Historical Studies. 1940–1941. Vol. II. P. 415–416.
58
The Statutes at Large… Vol. I. P. 44.
59
Casway J. Owen Roe O’Neill and the Struggle for Catholic Ireland. Philadelphia, 1984. P. 33–34.
60
Canny N. The Ideology of English Colonization: From Ireland to America // William and Mary Quarterly. 3d Ser. 1973. Vol. 30. P. 575–198.
61
Armitage D. Making the Empire British: Scotland in the Atlantic World, 1542–1707 // Past & Present. 1997. No. 155. P. 34–63.
62
Mason R. A. Scotching the Brut: Politics, History and National Myth in Sixteenth-Century Britain // Scotland and England, 1286–1815 / edit. by. R. Mason. Edinburgh, 1987. P. 115–117.
63
Russell C. The British Problem and the Civil War // History. 1987. Vol. LXXII. P. 395–415.
64
Оригинальная публикация: Федоров С. Е. «Domus regis» и «Familia regis» в раннее Новое время // Королевский двор в Англии XV–XVII веков / ред. и сост. С. Е. Федоров. СПб., 2011. С. 27–44.
65
Впервые
