ever before.
It wasn’t just that the Nacirema were new. Their tribal practices seemed particularly bizarre too. Practices that were so unusual, and so shocking, said Miner, that they might even be described as ‘an example of the extremes to which human behaviour can go’.
The Nacirema were gripped by magic. Their days were marked by a parade of rituals based on the human body. This in itself was not exceptional: countless tribes performed body rites, from fasting to tattooing. But what stood out about this tribe was their wacky beliefs about bodies.
To the Nacirema, the human body was fundamentally ugly and prone to decay. Their every ritual was dedicated to reversing this process at all costs. Some of the steps they took to do this verged on the barbaric. The men lacerated their faces with sharp instruments; the women baked their heads in small ovens. They also displayed a curious preoccupation with the mouth, which they would ritually fill with hog hairs and holy powders. It followed that Nacirema society conferred special status on the wise elders – the medicine men, the herbalists – who provided them with the charms and magical potions to stave off decay.
The spectre of physical deterioration was not the only thing that preoccupied the tribespeople: their very peculiar take on aesthetics also seemed to dominate their lives. The Nacirema were consumed by disgust for the body’s natural state. When a member of the tribe was too fat, they performed a ritual fast to become thin; when a member of the tribe was too thin, they held a ceremonial feast to become fat. The female breast was singled out for particular concern: the Nacirema used outlandish body-modification techniques to make women’s breasts ‘large if they are small, and smaller if they are large’.
Given the burdens they have imposed on themselves, Miner concluded, it is astonishing that the Nacirema have survived for so long.
*
What have you learned about the Nacirema?
That they are barbaric, masochistic? That they have questionable values? Do you see them as primitive, foreign, strange?
If these are the words that spring to mind, you’re on the same page as anthropology students today when they are given this study.
The thing is – and forgive me if you’ve already cottoned on to this – the Nacirema isn’t actually some weird, primitive tribe: it is ‘American’ written backwards.
Now that you’re in on Miner’s joke (or rather, his pedagogical tool), you can see that the behaviour and practices you found so strange are actually rather ordinary. When the men lacerated their faces, they were shaving; when the women put their heads in small ovens, they were under hair-dryers in a salon (this is the 1950s we’re talking about). When the Nacirema filled their mouths with hog hairs and magical powders, they were brushing their teeth; when they performed ritual fasts or feasts, they were watching their weight.
So why have so many people from the 1950s to the present day been tricked by Miner’s study?
In part this relates to how deferential we are to those who are labelled as ‘experts’. Miner was President of the American Anthropological Association, his article appeared in its house journal, and in it he deployed fellow academics to add weight to his assertions: Professors Linton, Malinowski and Murdock were all cited. We’ll be returning to the sway of experts in the next Step.
But it’s also down to something else.
The answer lies primarily in the power of language, the ability of carefully chosen words to shape our reactions, change the way we think and influence our decisions.
Think about Professor Miner’s choice of language. He introduced his subjects using the word ‘tribe’; and not any old tribe, but one with ‘particularly unusual aspects’. Throughout the text he used words like ‘rites’, ‘exorcism’, ‘natives’, ‘body rituals’ to further convey a sense of otherness, primitiveness and foreignness, when what he was really describing was the American citizen.
It’s a simple technique, but it’s very powerful. With just a few words, Miner takes the reader a long way from Manhattan or Kansas City. Unfamiliar language, unfamiliar reference points make the local and known feel distant and alien.
How easily manipulated we are.
The way things are communicated to us – the choice of words, images and metaphors used – has a huge impact on how we process and evaluate information and then go on to make decisions.
Youth-Infused Lies at the Beauty Counter
This is something the marketing industry knows all too well.
Flick through any women’s magazine, and choose just a few select turns of phrase from the glossy adverts that dominate its pages.
How about Garnier’s ‘Dark Spot Corrector’ – I definitely don’t want to be caught out with any ‘dark spots’ – got to add that to my shopping list.
Then there’s Lancôme’s ‘Cell Defence’: not only does it ‘fight ageing’, it also ‘fights oxidation’ – not sure exactly what that is, but if it needs fighting it must be bad. One of those too, please.
This sounds particularly good – Estée Lauder has just launched a ‘youth infusing serum’ for eyes – huge relief, my eyes could do with some youth infusion; so yes please, I’ll take some of that as well.
The language advertisers use to play on women’s latent insecurities today may not be as extreme as it was back in the 1960s – a 1969 advert for Guerlain anti-ageing cream was headlined ‘Are you going to crack up before you’re 45?’2 – nice! But they’re still doing a pretty good job of zooming in on women’s fears by reminding us in slightly more subtle ways of what we are not and can never really be – all with a few carefully selected words.
I know, of course, at an intellectual level that this is what they are doing. I know that ‘youth’ is not a chemical property that can be ‘infused’, and that Dior’s pledge to combine ‘a scientific breakthrough’ and ‘precious nature’ in a bottle of ‘Capture Totale’ is total nonsense. Yet I fall for their combination of fear-mongering and pseudo-scientific babble disturbingly frequently, and add yet another solution-promising beauty cream to my already over-full bathroom cabinet.
This is because our unconscious minds can lead us to make choices that our rational selves would never countenance. It’s not just at the beauty counter that this can happen. As we’ll see time and time again in this chapter, similar responses to this kind of emotive wordsmithery play out in an extraordinary range of contexts, including those with much more disturbing consequences.
If you’re not yet convinced that you need to keep your eyes wide open, this chapter should help to persuade you.
Verbal Avalanches …
Let’s dissect just one paragraph in George W. Bush’s 2003 State of the Union address, a speech which took place at a time when war with Iraq was under ‘discussion’ in American political circles.
Chemical agents, lethal viruses and shadowy terrorist networks are not easily contained. Imagine those nineteen hijackers with other weapons and other plans, this time armed by Saddam Hussein. It would take one vial, one canister, one crate slipped into this country to bring a day of
