needed?
<--- Score
75. What does Microsoft Ignite success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
76. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
77. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
78. How are the Microsoft Ignite’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
79. What are the expected benefits of Microsoft Ignite to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
80. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
81. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
82. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
83. What vendors make products that address the Microsoft Ignite needs?
<--- Score
84. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
85. How do you recognize an Microsoft Ignite objection?
<--- Score
86. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
87. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
88. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
89. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
90. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
91. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Microsoft Ignite research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
92. How do you assess your Microsoft Ignite workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
93. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
94. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
95. What Microsoft Ignite events should you attend?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Microsoft Ignite Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How did the Microsoft Ignite manager receive input to the development of a Microsoft Ignite improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
2. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
3. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
4. What are the Microsoft Ignite use cases?
<--- Score
5. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
6. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
7. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
8. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
9. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
10. Do you have a Microsoft Ignite success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
11. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
12. Why are you doing Microsoft Ignite and what is the scope?
<--- Score
13. What is the scope of the Microsoft Ignite effort?
<--- Score
14. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
15. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
16. What is in scope?
<--- Score
17. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<---
