and definitions?
<--- Score
106. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
107. Who is gathering Data philanthropy information?
<--- Score
108. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
109. Is the Data philanthropy scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
110. What are the core elements of the Data philanthropy business case?
<--- Score
111. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
112. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
113. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
114. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
115. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
116. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Data philanthropy goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
117. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
118. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
119. How will the Data philanthropy team and the group measure complete success of Data philanthropy?
<--- Score
120. What are (control) requirements for Data philanthropy Information?
<--- Score
121. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
122. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
123. Is Data philanthropy linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
124. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
125. How do you think the partners involved in Data philanthropy would have defined success?
<--- Score
126. How are consistent Data philanthropy definitions important?
<--- Score
127. What would be the goal or target for a Data philanthropy’s improvement team?
<--- Score
128. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
129. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
130. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
131. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Data philanthropy Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Among the Data philanthropy product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
2. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
3. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Data philanthropy? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
4. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
5. Do you have an issue in getting priority?
<--- Score
6. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?
<--- Score
7. Are the Data philanthropy benefits worth its costs?
<--- Score
8. How will success or failure be measured?
<--- Score
9. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
10. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
11. What are the Data philanthropy investment costs?
<--- Score
12. How much does it cost?
<---
