Source Selection Criteria: Functional Database Model213
2.38 Stakeholder Management Plan: Functional Database Model215
2.39 Change Management Plan: Functional Database Model217
3.0 Executing Process Group: Functional Database Model219
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Functional Database Model221
3.2 Change Request: Functional Database Model223
3.3 Change Log: Functional Database Model225
3.4 Decision Log: Functional Database Model227
3.5 Quality Audit: Functional Database Model229
3.6 Team Directory: Functional Database Model232
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Functional Database Model234
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Functional Database Model236
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Functional Database Model238
3.10 Issue Log: Functional Database Model240
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Functional Database Model242
4.1 Project Performance Report: Functional Database Model244
4.2 Variance Analysis: Functional Database Model246
4.3 Earned Value Status: Functional Database Model248
4.4 Risk Audit: Functional Database Model250
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Functional Database Model252
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Functional Database Model254
5.0 Closing Process Group: Functional Database Model256
5.1 Procurement Audit: Functional Database Model258
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Functional Database Model260
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Functional Database Model262
5.4 Lessons Learned: Functional Database Model264
Index266
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
2. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
3. How are the Functional Database Model’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
4. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
5. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Functional Database Model project?
<--- Score
6. Does Functional Database Model create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
7. What vendors make products that address the Functional Database Model needs?
<--- Score
8. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
9. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
10. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
11. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
12. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
13. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
14. What situation(s) led to this Functional Database Model Self Assessment?
<--- Score
15. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
16. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
17. For your Functional Database Model project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?
<--- Score
18. Do you need to avoid or amend any Functional Database Model activities?
<--- Score
19. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
20. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
21. Do you know what you need to know about Functional Database Model?
<--- Score
22. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
23. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
24. What are your needs in relation to Functional Database Model skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
25. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
26. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
