Score
65. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
66. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Scientific workflow management system?
<--- Score
67. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
68. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
69. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
70. What are the expected benefits of Scientific workflow management system to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
71. Does Scientific workflow management system create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
72. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
73. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
74. Will Scientific workflow management system deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
75. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
76. How do you assess your Scientific workflow management system workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
77. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
78. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
79. What are the Scientific workflow management system resources needed?
<--- Score
80. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Scientific workflow management system?
<--- Score
81. Think about the people you identified for your Scientific workflow management system project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
82. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
83. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
84. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
85. Who needs what information?
<--- Score
86. Did you miss any major Scientific workflow management system issues?
<--- Score
87. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
88. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
89. What would happen if Scientific workflow management system weren’t done?
<--- Score
90. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
91. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
92. What does Scientific workflow management system success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
93. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
94. What is the Scientific workflow management system problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
95. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
96. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
97. How are the Scientific workflow management system’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
98. Who should resolve the Scientific workflow management system issues?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Scientific workflow management system Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
2. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
3. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients
