Change Request: Fault Isolation219
3.3 Change Log: Fault Isolation221
3.4 Decision Log: Fault Isolation223
3.5 Quality Audit: Fault Isolation225
3.6 Team Directory: Fault Isolation228
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Fault Isolation230
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Fault Isolation232
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Fault Isolation234
3.10 Issue Log: Fault Isolation236
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Fault Isolation238
4.1 Project Performance Report: Fault Isolation240
4.2 Variance Analysis: Fault Isolation242
4.3 Earned Value Status: Fault Isolation244
4.4 Risk Audit: Fault Isolation246
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Fault Isolation248
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Fault Isolation250
5.0 Closing Process Group: Fault Isolation252
5.1 Procurement Audit: Fault Isolation254
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Fault Isolation256
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Fault Isolation258
5.4 Lessons Learned: Fault Isolation260
Index262
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
2. Do you need to avoid or amend any Fault isolation activities?
<--- Score
3. What is the extent or complexity of the Fault isolation problem?
<--- Score
4. Does your organization need more Fault isolation education?
<--- Score
5. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
6. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
7. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Fault isolation leader?
<--- Score
8. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
9. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Fault isolation will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
10. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
11. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
12. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
13. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
14. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
15. Will Fault isolation deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
16. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
17. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
18. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
19. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
20. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
21. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
22. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
23. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
24. Are there recognized Fault isolation problems?
<--- Score
25. What vendors make products that address the Fault isolation needs?
<--- Score
26. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
27. How do you assess your Fault isolation workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
28. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
29. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
30. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
31. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders
