ection>
PACIFIC CHOICE
The Provincial Performance Improvement Initiative
Papua New Guinea: A Case Study on Subnational Capacity Development
by Cedric Saldanha
Capacity Development Series
This sub-series is published by the Asian Development Bank to provide the governments of its Pacific developing member countries (PDMCs) with analyses and insights on key issues and lessons learned with respect to capacity development. Cases studied highlight a range of experiences throughout the region by sector, theme and source of external support, revealing approaches to capacity development that work best and the conditions that have been conducive to their success. They also explore the unique challenges faced by PDMCs in addressing capacity constraints as well as some of the opportunities facing governments and the people in the Pacific islands. Among other things, the case studies underline the importance of PDMC leadership, engagement of local partners, strategic attention to long-term capacity issues and effective use of external resources. It is our hope that the findings in these reports will help to guide future capacity building efforts in the Pacific.
© 2008 Asian Development Bank
All rights reserved. Published 2008.
Printed in the Philippines.
Cataloging-In-Publication Data
Publication Stock No. 167508
ISBN 978-971-561-726-0
Cataloging-In-Publication Data
Cedric Saldanha.
The provincial performance improvement initiative, Papua New Guinea: a case on sub-national capacity development
Mandaluyong City, Phil.: Asian Development Bank, 2008.
1. Provincial performance improvement initiative 2. Capacity development. 3. Papua New Guinea
I. Asian Development Bank. II. Australian Agency for International Development
The views expressed in this book are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID) and the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent.
ADB and AusAID do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accept no responsibility for any consequence of their use.
Use of the term “country” does not imply any judgment by the authors or ADB and AusAID as to the legal or other status of any territorial entity.
ADB encourages printing or copying information exclusively for personal and noncommercial use with proper acknowledgment of ADB. Users are restricted from reselling, redistributing, or creating derivative works for commercial purposes without the express, written consent of ADB.
6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City
1550 Metro Manila, Philippines
Tel +63 2 632 4444
Fax +63 2 636 4444
For orders, please contact:
Department of External Relations
Fax +63 2 636 2648
All artworks are by Demetrio Dela Cruz.
ACRONYMS
| AusAID | – | Australian Agency for International Development |
| DMT | – | district management team |
| DPLGA | – | Department of Provincial and Local Level Government |
| LLG | – | local-level government |
| NEFC | – | National Economic Fiscal Commission |
| PLLSMA | – | Provincial and Local Level Services Monitoring Authority |
| PMT | – | provincial management team |
| PNG | – | Papua New Guinea |
| PPII | – | Provincial Performance Improvement Initiative |
NOTE:
In this publication, “$” refers to US dollars.
FOREWORD
Despite 50 years of aid in the Pacific region, including some S$17 billion invested over the past 25 years, overall results in terms of sustainable improvements in capacity have been mixed, at best. This raises questions, not only in the Pacific but also throughout the developing world, about approaches to capacity development—what works, what doesn’t, and why? The Asian Development Bank (ADB) recognizes the importance of capacity development, having officially embraced it as a thematic priority in 2004. ADB’s commitment is consistent with the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and the Pacific Principles on Aid Effectiveness. The programs of a number of other funding agencies, including the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID), New Zealand’s Agency for International Development (NZAID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), and the World Bank also embrace the importance of more effective capacity development.
Increased interest in capacity development in recent years reflects an acknowledgment of the shortcomings in development assistance over the past 50 years. This has led to calls for approaches that are more systematic and integrated, and which focus more on developing country ownership and achievement of sustainable results. Capacity amounts to the policy, procedures, personnel, organizations, institutions, and supporting environment required to effectively deliver development outcomes. In particular, ADB has focused on the ability of public sector capacity to deliver essential services, thereby strengthening the compact between government, civil society, and the private sector. Capacity development is much more than just training or skills transfer. It is really about effective organizations and institutions, a sound unpoliticized policy environment, accountability systems, effective relationships, and appropriate incentives. And as noted in this study, capacity development should be firmly rooted in a country’s political economy.
To gain a better understanding of what works in terms of approaches to capacity development, ADB’s Pacific Department (PARD) commissioned a regional study in 2007. The study was rooted in 20 case studies from 11 countries across the region, prepared mainly by Pacific islands consultants. The case studies covered a range of programming experiences—from economic planning, to infrastructure development, health and legal sector reform, and civil society enhancement,
