[179]. Figure reproduced with kind permission; © 2009 American Chemical Society.Figure 12.32 (a) Comparison of the molar mass and size detection/separation range for different techniques; (b) Picture of a typical AF4 setup (www.schubert-group.uni-jena.de); (c) Schematic representation of the separation field in a AF4 channel (www.nanolytics.de). Source: (a) Yang et al. [177]. © 2015 American Chemical Society, (b) U.S. Schubert, (c) © Nanolytics.Figure 12.33 (a) Schematic representation of the supramolecular self‐sorting polymerization of 24 with two different cucurbituril derivatives. (b) Representation of the ratio‐dependent AF4 elution curves obtained by the MALS detector (the labeling of the curves indicates the applied CB[8]‐to‐CB[7] ratios). Source: Huang et al. [184]. © John Wiley & Sons.Figure 12.34 Schematic representation of the formation of single‐chain nanoparticles by intramolecular metallo‐supramolecular crosslinking of ligand‐functionalized polymers. Source: Neumann et al. [185].Figure 12.35 (a) Idealized representation of a TDA measurement in which the particles travel from the injection point to the detector with a residence time (t0); in this way, the particles are dispersed by a combination of pressure‐driven laminar flow and translational diffusion. (b) TDA profile of three different SCNPs. Source: (a) Lemal et al. [188]. © 2019 American Chemical Society, (b) Neumann [185].
Guide
4 Preface
9 Index
10 WILEY END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT
Pages
1 xi
2 xii
3 xiii
4 xiv
5 xv
6 xvi
7 xvii
8 xviii
9 xix
10 xx
11 1
12 2
13 3
14 4
15 5
16 6
17 7
18 8
19 9
20 10
21 11
22 12
23 13
24 14
25 15
26 16
27 17
28 18
29 19
30 20
31 21
32 22
33 23
34 24
35 25
36 26
37 27
38 28
39
