walk the tight-rope over the abyss, we are also the crocodiles lingering in the bleary waters who eat the ones who lost their balance. At least until we recognize the fact that the sinners are one part of ourselves and the crocodiles resemble the other part of the same existence.
But what about world piece?
The quest for paradise must remain an unfulfilled longing otherwise the human race has no ambition for development.
What ...? Why can’t the human race develop in piece and harmony?
A static paradise doesn’t offer enough foundations for the human ego to evolve, and therefore peace is never possible. Humanity needs war with the prospect of piece or perpetual crisis that includes the hope for paradise, which of course may not fulfil itself, so that it can serve as fundamental motivation for development.
Well I don’t know ... this sounds really brutal. Somehow I miss the term “Freedom”? What about our own, free will?
We have the freedom to do exactly that what vibrates within the collective frequency of the actual collective energy field of time, in a manner of speaking to implement a socially imprinted image of freedom within contracted, personal possibilities. It is always about “doing what has to be done”, like even Goethe knew already before our time. If we fulfil this aspiration, we perceive what leads to a conceived image of freedom.
Where does the final destination beyond our social and material aims lie?
Our origins lie within the spirit of the universe, within the unknown, and we came here to evolve – to learn about the laws of change within matter – This is about learning in what way we influence our world – To create the conditions under which we can change our reality, so we can understand the way our intellect is working. Only then can we realize that we are the ones who have to change if we want to improve the world.
b) Specific questions referring to higher realizations and human models
What do you think about the Christian image of God?
As long as we are not searching for this God deep within ourselves or in our memories but inside religious scripts, we should restrict our approach to the historical perspective of an anthropologist. Every human being hides the memory of the source of creation within his consciousness, the spiritual flame into which he wants to return. It is the longing for paradise that we repress in the course of our lives, the will to return into the blessed land, in which human beings construct their gods. Behind this however does not hide the fusion with, – and the return to – the divine origins but the egoistic claim to evolve from within oneself in a creative way and, in a sense, be godlike. The resulting conclusion is obvious: These images divert from reality – this collective God cannot help us, on the contrary, he strengthens and patronizes us in our illusion ...
... a divine phantom that – in a way – bites its own bottom?
God is an image, thought up by priests, which helps us to deal with the results of our own acquisitions. Somehow this is about assigning ourselves to the task that helps us to find God or the meaning of life within the consequences of our deeds. That is why this picture always points back to it’s creator: Humanity …
You think that mankind has created God after their example?
Sure, because we only ever see what we want to see, and we perceive everything in the world exactly the same way our collectively minted consciousness forces us to interpret the things we see, to prevent them from transgressing the borders of our common perception. Even worse: We only see the association with our collective thinking-structures, which we have evoked from within our cradle and since then differentiated and cultivated, confirmed by everything. Actually everything we see is nothing else but a brew mixed by electric impulses in our brain, that force us to relate to something so that we at least have two points between which we can navigate inside of his mechanisms. Just imagine our inner position from where we perceive the world, would displace itself, then the whole attention towards our reality would collapse, and then our whole civilization would vanish instantly.
But where is the origin of the impulse that causes the need to create such an image?
Within the collective intention itself! We form realities from within our spiritual force and our common imagination, in which we interact and therefore there’s need of an origin to which we can relate within our dual conception, so that we are not able to notice that all our images flow from within ourselves and we name this origin „God“. That’s the trick …
... the God-trick?
The collective intention is the impulse, to construct a reachable symbol from the fathomless numinous creation and place this self-created image like a mirror in front of us so that we can believe in it.
Does that mean that humanity is its own creator?
You are absolutely right! The first human beings had to – in a manner of speaking – invent their civilization first and the question, how this world could have come into being, helped them to find the answer, in the way they observed it. Our own assessment of this world out there in turn influenced the image they created from themselves, because we can only feel ourselves through our intuition, which is again initiated from the outside world. And through this perpetual interaction between the self-image and the outside world, they constructed their personal history.
The self image that reveals itself to us in our mirror helps us to trust the God who is looking back at us through the reflection?
Yes. As long as we do not realize that we ourselves are the ones who create the inventories of our symbolisms, we can not be able to see the fact that we in a way have become the filling of our own perception, and on this belief we can depend on. We see ourselves standing at the windows of our cerebrum staring out at the world through our eyes, but what we see is actually nothing else than a kind of formatted landscape out of our collective inventory.
Did I understand you correctly? The all-embracing frame which holds everything together is our faith?
To define this picture as what we want it to be a frame is necessary, and this frame consists of the many individual egos, through which we force each other to keep this self created image together.
And why do we have to keep this image together? Would the world break apart if we didn’t?
It is not the world that would break apart without a frame, for such a world could never have existed. It is the construction of our ego that always builds a controlled reality, which would collapse if we would suddenly have the idea of not believing in our self constructed world image any more.
Then our models would be nothing but a farce …?
In a sense, yes. Because we don’t know that reality on the outside in the way we know it was created by our collective creativity, so we could have something within our consciousness that we constructed, which we are able to control and therefore we really believe that the outer world is completely autonomous from our inner perception ...
... and every form of searching for God is a joke?
At least one that is to be taken very seriously, for this God is in fact the self-made life-goal of humanity within our minds! Let us go back in time: At the very beginning of mankind there was no God – just a few tools of consciousness, which variated us from animals and using them we were to carve our worldview out of eternity. This wish we have fulfilled ourselves, for these self fulfilled
