follow your counsels, Madam, it might result in my leaving him no crown at all.”
“Then leave him none!” she said in quick return, and with an air of jaunty indifference. “Perhaps better so. I, his mother, would rather see him a peasant than prince, with such a future as you are laying out for him.”
“Sire, the Earl of Strafford craves audience of your Majesty.”
This was said by a youth in the official costume of the Court, who had approached from the Palace, and stood with head bent before the King.
A remarkably handsome young fellow he was, and the Queen, as she turned her eyes on him, seemed to recover sweetness of temper.
“I suppose my company will be de trop now,” she said. Then facing towards the youth, and bestowing upon him one of her syren smiles – slyly though – she added, “Here, Eustace; bring this to my boudoir,” and she handed him a large book, a portfeuille of pictures, she had been all the while carrying.
Whether the King caught sight of that smile, and read something wrong in it, or not, he certainly seemed irritated, hastily interposing —
“No, Henriette, I’d rather have you stay.”
“Con tout plaisir.” A slight cloud upon her brow told the contrary. “Charles, too?”
“No; he can go. Yes, Trevor. Conduct the Lord Strafford hither.”
Eustace Trevor, as the handsome youth was called, bowing, turned and went off, the Prince with him. Then said the King —
“I wish you to hear what Strafford has to say on the subject we’ve been talking of.”
“Just what I wish myself,” she rejoined, resuming her air of braverie. “If you won’t listen to me, a weak woman, perhaps you will to him, a man —one of courage.”
Charles writhed under her speech, the last words of it. Even without the emphasis on them, they were more than an insinuation that he himself lacked that quality men are so proud of, and women so much admire. Almost a direct imputation, as if she had called him “coward!” But there was no time for him to make retort, angry or otherwise, even had he dared. The man seeking audience was already in the garden, and within earshot. So, swallowing his chagrin as he best could, and putting on the semblance of placidity, the King in silence awaited his coming up.
With an air of confident familiarity, and as much nonchalance as though they had been but ordinary people, Strafford approached the royal pair. The Queen had bestowed smiles on him too; he knew he had her friendship – moreover that she was the King’s master. He had poured flattery into her ears, as another Minister courtier of later time into those of another queen – perhaps the only point of resemblance between the two men, otherwise unlike as Hyperion to the Satyr. With all his sins, Wentworth had redeeming qualities; he was at least a brave man and somewhat of a gentleman.
“What do you say to this, my lord?” asked the Queen, as he came up. “I’ve been giving the King some counsel; advising him to dissolve the Parliament, or at least do something to stop them in their wicked courses. Favour us with your opinion, my lord.”
“My opinion,” answered the Minister, making his bow, “corresponds with that of your Majesty. Certes, half-hand measures will no longer avail in dealing with these seditious gabblers. There’s a dozen of them deserve having their heads chopped off.”
“Just what I’ve been saying!” triumphantly exclaimed the Queen. “You hear that, mon mari?”
Charles but nodded assent, waiting for his Minister to speak further.
“At the pace they’re going now, Sire,” the latter continued, “they’ll soon strip you of all prerogative – leave you of Royalty but the rags.”
“Ciel, yes!” interposed the Queen. “And our poor children! What’s to become of them?”
“I’ve just been over to the House,” proceeded Strafford; “and to hear them is enough to make one tear his hair. There’s that Hampden, with Heselrig, Vane, and Harry Martin – Sir Robert Harley too – talking as if England had no longer a king, and they themselves were its rulers.”
“Do you tell me that, Strafford?”
It was Charles himself who interrogated, now showing great excitement, which the Queen’s “I told you so” strengthened, as she intended it.
“With your Majesty’s permission, I do,” responded the Minister.
“By God’s splendour!” exclaimed the indignant monarch, “I’ll read them a different lesson – show them that England has a king – one who will hereafter reign as king should – absolute – absolute!”
“Thank you, mon ami,” said the Queen, in a side whisper to Strafford, as she favoured him with one of her most witching smiles, “He’ll surely do something now.”
The little bit of by-play was unobserved by Charles, the gentleman-usher having again come up to announce another applicant for admission to the presence: an historical character, too – historically infamous – for it was Archbishop Laud.
Soon after the oily ecclesiastic was seen coming along in a gliding, stealthy gait, as though he feared giving offence by approaching royalty too brusquely. His air of servile obsequiousness was in striking contrast with the bold bearing of the visitor who had preceded him. As he drew near, his features, that bore the stamp of his low birth and base nature, were relaxed to their meekest and mildest; a placid smile playing on his lips, as though they had never told a lie, or himself done murder!
Au fait to all that concerned the other three – every secret of Court and Crown – for he was as much the King’s Minister as Strafford, he was at once admitted to their council, and invited to take part in their conspirings. Appealed to, as the other had been, he gave a similar response. Strong measures should be taken. He knew the Queen wished it so, for it was not his first conference with her on that same subject.
Strafford was not permitted time to impart to his trio of listeners the full particulars of the cruel scheme, which some say, and with much probability, had its origin in Rome. For the guests of the gay Queen, expected every afternoon at Whitehall, began to arrive, interrupting the conference.
Soon the palace garden became lustrous with people in splendid apparel, the elite of the land still adhering to the King’s cause – plumed cavaliers, with dames old and young, though youth predominated, but not all of high degree, either in the male or female element. As in modern garden parties given by royalty, there was a mixture, both socially and morally, strange even to grotesqueness. The Franco-Italian Queen, with all her grand ideas of Divine Right and high Prerogative, was not loth to lay them down and aside when they stood in the way of her pleasures. She could be a very leveller where self-interest required it; and this called for it now. The King’s failing popularity needed support from all sides, classes, and parties, bad or good, humble or gentle; and in the assemblage she saw around her – there by her own invitation – such high bloods as Harry Jermyn, Hertford, Digby, Coningsby, Scudamore, and the like, touched sleeves with men of low birth and lower character – very reprobates, as Lunsford, afterwards designated “the bloody,” and the notorious desperado, David Hide! The feminine element was equally paralleled by what may be seen in many “society” gatherings of the present day – virtuous ladies brushing skirts with stage courtesans, and others who figure under the name of “professional beauties,” many of them bearing high titles of nobility, but
