its goals without understanding the influence of cosmic energies on mankind. Knowledge of the coercive type is important here. Therefore, throughout this paper we provide graphs and describe patterns that were discovered by various independent researchers. They are objective. Such presentation of material counts on common sense, when it becomes critical and prevents us from making sound decisions regarding the arrangement of Russia. Common sense should become a coercive factor in the arrangement of Russia.
Chapter 2. Energy of gravitational, electromagnetic fields, of the Earth's rotational velocity, and the corresponding clusters of plants, animals and types of people
2.1 Clusters of plants and types of people depending on the change of cosmic energies
2.1.1 Clusters of plants and animals
If the dependency between biota development and the Earth's rotational velocity is universal, then this trend will also manifest itself in the growth of cereals. The World Bank posseses the comprehensive data regarding the growth of cereals. Yes, the variability of cereal growth yield must be fully manifested due to the factors considered by scientists in the tree ring growth formula (see Chapter 3), but with addition of the most essential that spans all the natural – cultivation technologies. This is the use of fertilizers, irrigation, herbicides, seeds, biotechnology etc. The technological factor mostly determines the growth of cereals: yield is higher year by year, decade by decade.
Nevertheless, there are countries in which there is still the difference in cereal growth depending on the Earth's rotational velocity. E.g., the USA and Arab countries have relatively opposite GDP and cereal growth rates depending on the Earth's rotational velocity.
Let us look at the graph of tree rings growth of different clusters provided by Yu.P. Demakov.
Ref.: Yu. P. Demakov. Factors of annual tree growth dynamics. http://csfm.marstu.net/presentation/Demakov.pdf
There is an analogy. Is there a relationship between the cereal yield growth in the world and the Earth's rotational velocity?
Yes, there is such a relationship. But it mostly manifested itself in the 90s. At the beginning of the XXI century it became less pronounced. Note: correlation between the tree growth and the Earth's rotational velocity is negative in Russia, whereas for the cereals worldwide it is positive.
Will these dependencies remain regarding the intensity of the northern and southern solar magnetic fields?
On the graph above the cereal yield in Arab countries and in the USA is time-coordinated with the change of intensity of the solar magnetic field.
Let us enlarge the part of the graph, which is closer in time to the inversion of the magnetic field on the Sun in 2013.
In the USA, cereal yield is higher than in Arab countries when the northern magnetic pole is positive. With the sign change of the solar magnetic pole the graph of cereal yield growth in these countries diverges. For the cereals that grow in the USA the period when the northern magnetic pole has a positive charge is more favorable. Whereas for the cereals that grow in Arab countries the period when the northern magnetic pole has a negative charge is more favorable. But this is also connected with the Earth's rotational velocity.
Magnetic fields of the Sun and the Earth, as well as the velocity of its rotation, are all interconnected.
There is the graph to support this:
First, the Earth's magnetic field changes, after that – its rotational velocity. Although, at the scale of hundreds of years, this shift is not very noticeable.
Growth of plants is statistically related to the change of the Earth's magnetic field and with the change of its rotational velocity. Take into account that in different regions of the Earth the change dynamics of the magnetic field varies. Therefore, the shift to obtain a mapping between the graphs of the Earth's rotational velocity and the magnetic field intensity might be different in time.
The difference in cereal growth in the United States and Arab countries is higher at the greater difference in the intensity of the southern and northern solar magnetic fields.
Intensity of the solar magnetic pole is related to intensity of the Earth's magnetic pole. This relationship can be understood by analyzing the graph of Ukrainian scientists (V.D. Rusov, et al., 2011).
There is a relationship, a correspondence, but it is shifted in time.
What relationship is there between the cereal yield in the world and the intensity of the Earth's magnetic field? To learn this, let us take the data of space monitoring of the magnetic field intensity in various regions of the Earth.
Swarm reveals Earth’s changing magnetism, ESA, 19 June 2014, http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Observing_the_Earth/Swarm/Swarm_reveals_Earth_s_changing_magnetism
We will also present a graph of the change in the Earth's rotational velocity on the day when the data of its magnetic field were obtained.
It can be seen that the intensity of the magnetic field over North America is higher than over Arab countries. Then maybe this is the reason why we have a difference in cereal growth rates?
We will recheck this by comparing cereal growth in the world (matches cereal growth in the USA) with the growth in Argentina and Brazil where the magnetic field intensity is much lower.
Let us compare it with cereal yield in the USA.
Yes, the trends of yield growth by years are relatively opposite. Although growth prevails in all countries. And correlation between these data is positive. Whereas each year fluctuations, deviations from mean values, anomalies are relatively opposite.
The greatest differences in fluctuation rates occur in the late 80s, early 90s. The smallest differences occur in 1961 and 2013. 2013 is the time of polarity reversal of the solar magnetic field. This process is prolonged, it takes more than a year. But exactly in 2013 there were the greatest changes of the solar magnetic fields on its poles. The North Pole became positive. These years, there is the smallest difference in cereals growth between the USA and Arab countries. According to our data, in 2013 the difference in EEG frequencies of the subjects also decreased. GDP growth rates of various countries became less variable than they were before.
How did trees usually grow in Argentina, Brazil and the USA?
The trees have relatively opposite indicators, the same as in the case
