We Are Not Such Things: A Murder in a South African Township and the Search for Truth and Reconciliation. Литагент HarperCollins USD

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу We Are Not Such Things: A Murder in a South African Township and the Search for Truth and Reconciliation - Литагент HarperCollins USD страница 21

We Are Not Such Things: A Murder in a South African Township and the Search for Truth and Reconciliation - Литагент HarperCollins USD

Скачать книгу

applied to their hair and faces to look more youthful. Easy ordered a vitamin-C-enriched sports drink “for hydration,” and, deeming it the least complicated item on the menu, Chinese chicken. He tried to express to the teenage waitress that he wished only for the chicken element of the dish, minus vegetables or sauces, but she stared at him with wonder and he gave up. When his lunch arrived, he ate it daintily, picking out every sliver of red pepper and pineapple.

      I started off with a long introduction, rambling on uncertainly until Easy looked at me, blew his nose, and said, not unkindly, “Just throw the question.”

      At the time of our first meeting, journalists both foreign and South African had been snapping photos and asking Easy questions about Amy Biehl for eighteen years. Since 1993, he had been locked in a strange relationship with the press. I later realized that despite being the subject of much media scrutiny, he rarely consumed any news and therefore was largely unaware of and unconcerned by the various representations of him.

      He had no idea that The New York Times called him “a small man, a little imp of a guy … his eyes are quick, set deep in his face, and can harden as fast as an African storm.” He had not read Nancy Scheper-Hughes’s article on suffering, published in a 1995 issue of the academic journal Social Justice, in which she detailed the scars etched on his young body, which told a “vivid story of township violence: stab wounds, brick bashings, machete chops, second-degree burns, scars from untreated infections and botched, discriminatory medical care.” In 1994, when the press crowded around the courthouse during the criminal trial for Amy’s murder, Easy emerged onto the steps and his face fell into a bashful smile, all the flashbulbs and attention on him. He wore a patterned wool sweater and a gold chain hung with a palm-sized medallion shaped like the African continent. He seemed to enjoy the taste of celebrity, no matter its origin, and he didn’t understand how his grin might be perceived. At the very least, he didn’t quite know what to do about all the flashing cameras except to say cheese.

      Since then, Easy had forgotten how many people he’d spoken to. He gave them all similar quotes. He knew the drill. He was supposed to discuss issues facing the township, the power of forgiveness, his own shining rehabilitation, and the credit due his American benefactors, the Biehls. He was to juxtapose the old and the new, the radical and the reformed.

      “At that time I was young and under the influence of the PAC,” he told an American journalist, referring to the Pan Africanist Congress, the political party upon whose orders he claimed he acted when killing Amy. “Now it’s democracy, and we understand each other. I’m happy, I’m free, I’m normal, I’m positive because of Makhulu and Tatomkhulu—they make me strong.”

      “Politics can cost you your life, family, and everything important to you,” he explained to a reporter from New Zealand. “I decided it was time to look after myself and my family first.”

      “I know that previous it was apartheid, so once the foundation come to us, I think, this is my dream, to seek to work for my people,” he explained, in halting English, to a grinning Katie Couric.

      The Amy Biehl Foundation liked to sit visitors in a lightless back room and play an old Dateline NBC segment, “The Amy Biehl Story,” narrated by Diane Sawyer, followed by a documentary that celebrated the Biehls’ acts of forgiveness. Easy tended to duck out when the screen lit up; he could not bear to see his younger self on film. He had once asked a manager to stop playing the DVD to guests, but to no avail. Once, he’d been shocked to find a picture of his daughter in a Dutch magazine. Sure, some people came and snapped photos, but he hadn’t understood they’d be published.

      “Please take the picture out,” he begged Linda, who informed him that she was not able to remove a print from a published magazine.

      Since then, he’d only grown more accustomed and resigned to the media presence in his life. He was no longer thrilled by his little piece of fame. At this point, doing interviews was a way to please others, mostly his bosses at the foundation, who marched him out as a fundraising and public relations asset. Ntobeko had recused himself from such requests.

      “I’ve lost my interest in journalists,” Ntobeko informed me on the single occasion he had agreed to speak with me, at Linda’s request. The breaking point, he said, was a 2005 article that began: The mother of murdered US aid worker Amy Biehl attended the wedding of her daughter’s killer and danced with the groom. The article contained a quote by Ntobeko, though he swore he’d never given an interview. Ever since then, he’d decided that he despised journalists.

      “I don’t even read the news,” he added. “Lately, I’ve just been reading motivational speakers.”

      Since Ntobeko refused to be paraded before the media, Easy was the foundation’s best chance at putting a face to their unique story. Plus, Linda often urged Easy to speak to journalists, and he could not refuse her. And then there were the journalists themselves, many like me, who came from so far and seemed so desperate and were so easily placated. How could he deny me, a sorry character who had been, at that point, begging him for a meeting for nearly two months?

       6.

      The settler and the native are old acquaintances. In fact, the settler is right when he speaks of knowing “them” well. For it is the settler who had brought the native into existence and who perpetuates his existence. The settler owes the fact of his very existence, that is to say, his property, to the colonial system.

      —FRANTZ FANON, The Wretched of the Earth

      Whatever happens, we have got

      The Maxim gun, and they have not.

      —HILAIRE BELLOC

      Easy Nofemela was born on June 6, 1971, as Mzikhona Nofemela. Mzikhona’s literal Xhosa meaning is: “We have a home [through him].” Easy’s mother, Kiki, is from the Sotho ethnic group, and his father, Wowo, is Xhosa; the two met in Gugulethu in 1968.

      “The time I see Kiki, I was only Kiki,” Wowo remembered. “I was running after her and try and try and try, and it work.”

      Wowo was twenty-one. Kiki was thirteen. Within the year, she had given birth to their first son.

      “If you can see her then, you can’t see she is young, but I was nearly in jail for that,” Wowo explained, forty-seven years later. “But I said to her family, ‘I do everything for her.’ And from that time, I not leave her.”

      They married in 1970. Mzikhona, their second son, took on the nickname Easy, for his easygoing temperament.

      “Easy come, easy go. Easy to accept pain. Easy to release the pain,” Easy once explained to me.

      Only Kiki continued to call him Mzikhona, especially when she was cross. “Mmm-zee-KOH-na,” she would say loudly, her face stern, and Easy would hop to: Sorry, sorry. Then he’d usually do the same wrong thing, whatever it was, the very next day, and on and on into his forties, which is to say he never stopped getting in trouble with his mom.

      Kiki had her generous breasts sucked dry by the stream of ravenous babies; she put peanut butter on her nipples to get them to leave her alone, but they still cried for more. Kiki fell pregnant with a girl, but endured a stillbirth late in the pregnancy.

      “If that girl was living, I got eight children,” Wowo reflected.

      In the end, she produced

Скачать книгу