students' performance. Labour Economics, 34, 13–25. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2015.02.002.
5
Gorbatov, S., & Lane, A. (2018). Is HR missing the point on performance feedback? MIT Sloan Management Review, 59 (4), 65–71.
6
Moss, S. E., & Sanchez, J. I. (2004). Are your employees avoiding you? Managerial strategies for closing the feedback gap. Academy of Management Executive, 18 (1), 32–44. doi: 10.5465/AME.2004.12691168.
7
Moss, S. E., Valenzi, E. R., & Taggart, W. (2003). Are you hiding from your boss? The development of a taxonomy and instrument to assess the feedback management behaviors of good and bad performers. Journal of Management, 29 (4), 487–510. doi: 10.1016/S0149–2063_03_00022–9.
8
Anseel, F., Beatty, A. S., Shen, W., Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2015). How are we doing after 30 years? A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and outcomes of feedback-seeking behavior. Journal of Management, 41 (1), 318–348. doi: 10.1177/0149206313484521.
9
Rasheed, A., Khan, S.-U.-R., Rasheed, M. F., & Munir, Y. (2015). The impact of feedback orientation and the effect of satisfaction with feedback on in-role job performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 26 (1), 31–51. doi: 10.1002/ hrdq.21202.
10
Kinicki, A. J., Prussia, G. E., Wu, B. (J.), & McKee-Ryan, F. M. (2004). A covariance structure analysis of employees' response to performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (6), 1057–1069. doi: 10.1037/0021–9010.89.6.1057.
11
Lam, C. F., DeRue, D. S., Karam, E. P., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (2011). The impact of feedback frequency on learning and task performance: Challenging the "more is better" assumption. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116 (2), 217–228. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.002.
12
Casas-Arce, P., Lourenço, S. M., & Martínez-Jerez, F. A. (2017). The performance effect of feedback frequency and detail: Evidence from a field experiment in customer satisfaction. Journal of Accounting Research, 55 (5), 1051–1088. doi: 10.1111/1475–679X.12184.
13
Там же.
14
Lombardo, M. M., & Eichinger, R. W. (2012). Leadership machine (10th anniv. ed.). (n. p.): Lominger International, p. 127.
15
Audia, P. G., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. (2000). The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5), 837–853. doi: 10.2307/1556413.
16
Шарма Р. Монах, который продал свой «феррари». Притча об исполнении желаний и поиске своего предназначения. – М.: АСТ, 2019.
17
Sharma, R. [@RobinSharma]. (2013, September 20). Negative feedback can make us bitter or better. https://twitter.com/robinsharma/status/381087770761916416.
18
Van-Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2004). Feedback sign effect on motivation: Is it moderated by regulatory focus? Applied Psychology, 53 (1), 113–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1464–0597.2004.00163.x.
19
Там же.
20
London, M., & Smither, J. W. (2002). Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Management Review, 12 (1), 81–100. doi: 10.1016/s1053–4822(01)00043–2.
21
Tenney, E. R., Logg, J. M., & Moore, D. A. (2015). (Too) optimistic about optimism: The belief that optimism improves performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108 (3), 377–399. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000018.
22
Warrenfeltz, R., & Kellett, T. (2015). Coaching the dark side of personality: High impact strategies to build a winning leadership reputation. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems, pp. 30–31.
23
Sommer, K. L., & Kulkarni, M. (2012). Does constructive performance feedback improve citizenship intentions and job satisfaction? The roles of perceived opportunities for advancement, respect, and mood. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 23 (2), 177–201. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21132.
24
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2), 254–284. doi: 10.1037/0033–2909.119.2.254.
25
Godin, S. (2010, February 04). What's expected vs. what's amazing. https://seths.blog/2010/02/whats-expected-vs-whats-amazing/ (дата обращения – 5 ноября 2018 года).
26
Только представьте себе результаты данного исследования. В условиях работы высокой сложности корреляция между когнитивными способностями и эффективностью достигает очень высокого уровня – от 0,50 до 0,60. Однако даже при выполнении самых простых заданий корреляция остается существенной – от 0,30 до 0,40. См.: Kuncel, N. R., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2010). Individual differences as predictors of work, educational, and broad life outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 49 (4), 331–336.
