91. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
92. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
93. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
94. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
95. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
96. What are (control) requirements for Oracle Application Testing Suite Information?
<--- Score
97. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
98. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Oracle Application Testing Suite results are met?
<--- Score
99. Who are the Oracle Application Testing Suite improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
100. Do you have a Oracle Application Testing Suite success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
101. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
102. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
103. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
104. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
105. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
106. What is the context?
<--- Score
107. What Oracle Application Testing Suite services do you require?
<--- Score
108. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
109. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
110. How can the value of Oracle Application Testing Suite be defined?
<--- Score
111. Is the Oracle Application Testing Suite scope manageable?
<--- Score
112. Have all basic functions of Oracle Application Testing Suite been defined?
<--- Score
113. How do you catch Oracle Application Testing Suite definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
114. How would you define Oracle Application Testing Suite leadership?
<--- Score
115. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
116. How do you think the partners involved in Oracle Application Testing Suite would have defined success?
<--- Score
117. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
118. What is in scope?
<--- Score
119. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
120. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
121. What gets examined?
<--- Score
122. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Oracle Application Testing Suite leverage and how?
<--- Score
123. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
124. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
125. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
126. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
127. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
128. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
129. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
130. What are the Oracle Application Testing Suite use cases?
<--- Score
131. How do you hand over Oracle Application Testing Suite context?
<--- Score
132. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
133. What is the definition of Oracle Application Testing Suite excellence?
<--- Score
134. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback –
