Score
15. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
16. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
17. Is there a critical path to deliver Organizational justice results?
<--- Score
18. What are the core elements of the Organizational justice business case?
<--- Score
19. Will a Organizational justice production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
20. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
21. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
22. What is in scope?
<--- Score
23. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
24. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
25. Who is gathering Organizational justice information?
<--- Score
26. Will team members regularly document their Organizational justice work?
<--- Score
27. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
28. Is Organizational justice currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
29. Do you have a Organizational justice success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
30. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
31. Who approved the Organizational justice scope?
<--- Score
32. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
33. Will team members perform Organizational justice work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
34. How do you think the partners involved in Organizational justice would have defined success?
<--- Score
35. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
36. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
37. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
38. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Organizational justice?
<--- Score
39. Who are the Organizational justice improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
40. What are the Organizational justice use cases?
<--- Score
41. What system do you use for gathering Organizational justice information?
<--- Score
42. Have all basic functions of Organizational justice been defined?
<--- Score
43. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
44. What is the scope of the Organizational justice work?
<--- Score
45. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
46. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
47. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
48. What are the Organizational justice tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
49. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
50. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
51. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
52. What is the definition of Organizational justice excellence?
<--- Score
53. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
54. Has a Organizational justice requirement not been met?
<--- Score
55. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
56. Are the Organizational justice requirements complete?
<--- Score
57. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Organizational justice results are met?
<--- Score
58. Has your scope been defined?
<---
