The Common Core Companion: Booster Lessons, Grades 3-5. Leslie Blauman

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу The Common Core Companion: Booster Lessons, Grades 3-5 - Leslie Blauman страница 8

The Common Core Companion: Booster Lessons, Grades 3-5 - Leslie Blauman

Скачать книгу

do this? How does he or she support it—what reasoning is given?

      Share student thinking as a whole group and begin to discuss how opinion writing is different from narrative and informative or explanatory texts. Record on chart paper. However, while opinion writing is its own standard, opinion and persuasion are often found in narratives and informative and explanatory texts.

      Also, start an anchor chart of “Types of Opinion or Persuasive Writing.” Begin with the type you just read to the students and then model or brainstorm a few more. Have students work independently, continuing to brainstorm examples of opinion writing that they see in the real world, recording their thinking in their writer’s notebooks.

      After 5 minutes, share ideas from their lists, either whole class, small group, or with partners. Challenge students to add to this list and to look for examples in their world and bring these in as mentor texts. The important thing to remember, though, is to have the kids do the work—let them search and notice! Students will be contributing to a class set of opinion writing samples that will turn into mentor texts.

      Wrap Up

      T: Now it’s your turn to think about your point of view, your opinions, and what you care about deeply. I want you to start a list of possible opinion and persuasive topics in your writer’s notebook. This doesn’t mean that you have to write about them; it’s just a way to get you thinking about possible topics. And we’ll keep adding to these as we continue to learn about opinion writing.

      With those directions, students work independently on their list of topics. Inviting students in on the search for examples of a type of writing is a staple in my class. It creates student ownership and they find examples I could never imagine (Ray, 2006).

      Snapshot of a Turn-and-Talk Peer Conference on POV

Image 17

      Deep discourse about texts and ideas deepens students’ understanding—but it takes plenty of explicit “training” to do it well. Research on the importance of student talk and how to scaffold it is in abundance (Allen, 2009; Allington, 2006; Blauman, 2011; Daniels, 2002; Fisher, Frey, & Lapp, 2013; Gallagher, 2015; Harvey & Goudvis, 2000; Hattie, 2012). Before students can participate in any shared discussions—teacher-led whole group, partner work, or small group—you need to model and teach about listening and speaking skills. Creating class norm charts or expectation charts for speaking and listening in a variety of situations is essential. Providing students with models or prompts of questions they can ask to push thinking scaffolds them. Partner sharing (or turn and talk) allows all students to have their voices heard and keeps lessons lively and interactive.

      The following turn-and-talk example occurred after reading the second book, The Wolf’s Story in the reading lesson. Students were to discuss the POV and how they figured it out. Eavesdrop in on one of the conversations to see how the speaking and listening standards are embedded into reading. Prior to this lesson, turn and talk was explicitly taught and students had ample time to practice over a few days. We created anchor charts of what makes good listening and speaking skills, along with prompts and sentence starters to get conversations going and moving to deeper levels.

      The class has had time to discuss and I’ve had time to listen in on various conversations, assessing their understanding of POV. If it had been apparent that the majority of the class did not understand, then I would reteach the concept the next day. Informal assessments always guide my instruction—it’s about student needs and understanding! We come back together as a group and I have different partners share their thinking. I have Jose and Carson share their discussion about toffee and other students say they ran into the same problem. This is a great teachable moment of how we can use each other to understand new vocabulary—and use context clues.

      Core Connections

       Grade 4

       Speaking and Listening Standard 1 (b, c, and d)

      Students engage in a range of collaborative discussions with diverse partners on grade 4 topics and texts, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly. They follow agreed-upon rules for discussion, pose and respond to specific questions to clarify or follow up on information, make comments that contribute to the discussion and link to the remarks of others, and review the key ideas expressed and explain their own ideas and understanding in light of the discussion.

      T: Now that we’ve finished The Wolf’s Story I’d like you to turn and talk with your partner about your answer to “Who is telling the story and what is their point of view?” Remember to also share the specifics from the text that support your answer and thinking. Also, remember to follow our agreed-upon norms for sharing thinking with a partner.

       These norms are

       One student shares her thinking and why

       Partner rephrases what he heard and adds to it—either agreeing or disagreeing and why

       First student can either expand on the thinking and explanation or ask the partner to share his thoughts

       This pattern is repeated; however, students should continue to discuss a point if it leads to deeper understanding

      As students discuss, the teacher eavesdrops, nudging students when necessary or asking if they’d like to share their thinking with the whole group after partner time is finished.

      Jose: It’s pretty obvious that the Wolf is telling the story and he thinks it’s not his fault, right?

      A productive, successful conversation. The boys are following the class expectation of restating what they’ve heard before continuing the conversation. Doing so prevents students from just throwing out lots of thoughts without analysis. This type of back and forth takes time and practice.

      Carson: I agree—remember when the Wolf said, “Would I lie to you?” And that the old woman started it? He’s like totally trying to change the story and blame her.

      Jose: Yeah. I like the part about toffee. I get that it’s a candy, but what is it?

      Carson: I’ve never had it either, but it’s got to be sticky, right? Cuz it made Grandma’s teeth stick together and it was actually pretty important to the story. Remember at the end when the Wolf thought Red was going to put toffee in his mouth and he jumped out of bed and she thought he was going to eat her and that he’d eaten the Grandma? That really showed his point of view, that he didn’t do anything wrong, but she thought he did.

      Jose: And she started screaming and the woodsman came in. Maybe we could ask Ms. B what toffee is?

      Notice how Jose and Carson are really listening to each other. When they get to “toffee” they use context clues to get the gist. Both boys have the word written on one of their sticky notes. Readers need to pay attention to vocabulary—and words they don’t know. The boys wave me over (even though I’ve been listening) and ask what toffee is. I explain and ask them how that helps them understand the text better. They tell me and then I ask if they will share with the whole group how even though they not only deduced its meaning, but its importance to the plot.

      Carson:

Скачать книгу