Gun Digest 2011. Dan Shideler
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Gun Digest 2011 - Dan Shideler страница 75
With antelope being the primary target, and having several doe kid tags to fill, my target weights were at or near 100 pounds. Now I was setting out in northern Harding country South Dakota, with the first in my pair the handloaded Barnes 62-grain bullets. The handload pushed the Barnes TST at 3628 fps behind a burning mass of Varget in a 38.5 grain charge. This load was max for Varget and the Barnes bullet but was able to stay close to the Swift even at its increased grain weight. As an example, the .220 Swift when loaded with a 53-grain Barnes TSX FB bullet leaves the muzzle at a maximum velocity of 3882 if pushed by a 43.5 grain charge of AA 2700. “Yes, a couple of hundred feet faster,” you’re saying – but also a bullet nine grains lighter with less kinetic energy on target after the speed thing begins to dry up a bit down range. In my book it all balances out when comparing very high velocity loads and modest grain weight changes back to back. Speed kills, and with light bullet and small calibers you can’t get them moving fast enough. Even a slight change in grain weight can return major dividends at the target in terms of raw energy, which translates into killing force.
My first goat taken with the .223 WSSM was a young buck within legal kid goat size (horn length). He was angling across a shallow draw and moving directly across me from right to left at a bit under 100 yards. He had just cleared a fence and seemed to be more interested in what was following him than he was in me. Shooting off a set of Bog Pod sticks, I saw my shot hit just behind the shoulder, about mid-body. The antelope reacted much like those whitetail had during the late season doe hunt in that cornfield, and after hunching up a bit, he just trotted over the ridge and out of sight. Moving up the draw quickly so as to get another crack at him, I now observed the animal going up a steep rise right to left. knowing that game in general won’t go uphill when hit hard, I clearly understood that this guy required an additional shot in the vitals. Round two hit him higher, and with the addition of that second bullet he went down hard. Both bullets had exited the back side of the critter, with the first hit taking out a lower section of lung and the second the top of his heart. In this case a shot inside 150 yards maximum (the second shot) had done a good job. Now, however, the question still remained: did the first round make him sick enough to fall to the second hit? I guess we will never know, but a subsequent pair of goats a few weeks later did shed some additional light on the subject.
This whitetail buck can be taken at reasonable range limits, but bullet placement is everything when shooting light rifles.
Glassing a water hole on my friend Randy Routier’s ranch hunting operation at Buffalo, South Dakota, I had been camped out on a ridge top for two days and had been sitting in wait for a good buck to show up with his harem of doe goats. It was well into the first season at this point, and these animals were skittish to say the least. About mid afternoon on the second day of my hunt, 11 goats came walking up a draw and onto the water hole. Seeing no trophy buck in the bunch, I set aside my .25-06, a go-to system for long-range trophy work, and looked down the .223 WSSM at a good-sized (over 100 pounds) goat. The .223 WSSM was loaded with the Barnes 53-grain TSX flatbase at the same velocity as the Swift (3913 f.p.s.) via 40.5 grains of Varget. Aiming again at the point again just behind the left shoulder and a bit high, I caught the doe’s heart and one lung with the Barnes. At the shot my doe just walked off the edge of the stock tank, then proceeded to fall over within about 15 yards. Like the previous .223 WSSM kill, no bullet was recovered. At a range of 125 yards, everything in the bullet department was moving just too fast for the small-frame animal to hold that pill in place.
It should be pointed out at this time that handloading Barnes bullets in a .223 WSSM with a bore twist rate of 1 in 9 inches means keeping the grain weight under that of the tested 62-grain TSX bullet. My rifle, however, while not being known to shoot accurate groups with that heavy bullet, did return game harvesting accuracy. In most cases, it is best to stay with the published game plan for the .223 WSSM in a factory rifle and shoot the 53- to 55-grain or lighter bullets. As a final note, remember: it is always advisable to test on paper extensively before going afield.
Over the course of three hunts I elected to turn to the .223 WSSM, which resulted in two of my own goats, an assist on a third for a friend, and and an additional whitetail. In each case the fast moving .22 caliber got the job done, but not always within easy walking distance from the point at which the animal was first hit by the light bullets.
MORE POWDER AND MORE BULLET
When my partner Mr. Bressler elected to turn to his DPMS .243 on that cornfield hunt and subsequent hunts later in the season, he was eliminating the possible loss of an animal because of underachieving ballistics downrange as applied to lighter bullets and rifles. After spending almost two full years with the .224 caliber bullets in a variety of cartridges that ranged from high velocity to very high speed varmint type separators, I came to the conclusion that when you can use medium calibers that offer state-of-the-art ballistics performance, why even bother with the small stuff? The move to a .25 WSSM, 25-06, and, yes, even the 243 Winchester clearly illustrated a major step forward in performance. In terms of selection, about equal time was split between the .25 WSSM and .25-06 with an industry cull hunt using the 243 Winchester stuck right in the middle. It was a convenient series of hunts, and I managed to get a great deal accomplished in terms of some back-to-back comparisons.
Shooting a new Speer test bullet at 100 grains during the cull hunt, I was assigned to a tower stand on a very wide open trail that was boarded by heavy pine forest, and then given a list of what to take and exactly where to place the shots. In all cases the .243 out to 235 ranged yards did a good job of cleanly taking my test subject with single well-placed shots. Shooting involved right angle vital shooting, sharp angle shots from back to front, and head-on shooting for vital penetration testing. Special metal-sensing systems used in detecting land mines (no, I’m not kidding) were employed to locate bullets that had not passed through the targets.
That deer shoot had been the official type event, but then I headed back to South Dakota and a few other states, hunting on my own for some detailed review time with the .25 WSSM and .25-06 Remington. With a buck license on a wide-open prairie unit and a second doe tag as well, I went to work with my Model 70 Winchester chambered in .25 WSSM. The bullet was the 110-grain Accu Bond in a Winchester factory wrapper. Bullet choice was Winchester factory or handloads, due in fact to the cartridge being loaded only by Winchester at the time of that test shooting. Federal was making brass for a period of time, or at least some of it crossed my reloading dies with their headstamp on them, but the WSSM line in all calibers is a exclusive product of the Winchester folks.
My first South Dakota kill involved a nice buck at 225 yards. I had been belly-crawling this guy all mid-morning for a clean, clear shot. He was courting three doe whitetail and was paying very little attention to the green and brown blob that was crawling toward him out on the open prairie. When I got set for my shot, he was clear of the does and now presented a solid left-to-right broadside vital area bullet contact point. At the shot, the deer, which I judged to be about three years old, dropped to his belly, never moving even a foot forward. The Accu Bond 110-grain bullet had done its job, and I was gaining more interest in this short, fat super-cartridge that had been thought up by Winchester. With two additional deer taken with the .25 WSSM, I was seriously wondering why anyone would even start to take up the .224 caliber bullet as a serious deer harvesting system. To me it was much like shooting waterfowl with a 28 gauge. It just didn’t fit the proper profile of a game harvesting gun system.
Author with a full-size deer target when setting up his Savage Predator .22-250 for taking big game with the .224-caliber bullet.
With some additional hunting with my old and well-used .25-06 matched with Federal