rel="nofollow" href="#ulink_3813eb23-93a3-59db-86c0-210c229094f4">150
In the 19th century, the Arctic areas of Greenland attracted the attention of several world powers, in particular the US and the UK, for whom the exploration of remote and trackless Arctic territories – the last “uncharted parts” of the Western world – was a matter of re-asserting their prestige and position in the international power structure.151 The enhanced interest in successive expeditions and their profound discursivisation fostered a dynamic, coherent discourse on the exploration of polar zones.152 The fact that the Scandinavian countries joined the rivalry for the last “undiscovered” areas in the second half of the 19th century was associated with the rise of nationalism in these countries, which was expressed in what Swedish scholar Inger Nilsson calls “small state imperialism” [Swedish: småstatsimperialism].153 Small state imperialism manifested itself in an ←54 | 55→increased preoccupation with the Far North, its scientific conquest and, importantly, territorial expansion.154 As in Said’s Orientalism, science and conquest went hand in hand.155
Kirsten Hastrup observes that the self-reflectivity of polar explorers and their motivations to act were associated with nationalism, patriotism and national pride.156 Polar research boosted scientific careers and, at the same time, made participants of the expeditions into national heroes, if they only managed to make it back home.157 Scandinavian polar explorers took part in the international race for new political, geographical and scientific feats, and their achievements were not only relevant to their own careers and hero status, but also had political implications and an immense impact on their national cultures.158 While Swedish and Norwegian polar explorers were committed first and foremost to exploring uninhabited areas of Greenland (the first crossing of the icesheet over the island’s interior, attempts at explaining the circulation of sea currents around Greenland, efforts to reach the North Pole), Denmark – which was the last Scandinavian country to join the race for glory and prestige – dispatched scientific expeditions to the yet-unexamined areas of Greenland in order to study their indigenous ←55 | 56→populations as well.159 A separate scientific discipline referred to as polar studies evolved and received institutional validation in 1878, when the Committee for the Management of Scientific Research in Greenland [Danish: Kommissionen for Ledelse af Videnskabelige Undersøgelser i Grønland] was founded.160 Operating until 1931, the Committee was the force behind sending fifty early scientific expeditions to Greenland.161 The knowledge produced by the discourse of polar studies was legitmised by the discipline’s alliance with colonial state institutions, which also supported the expeditions with funding. Consequently, polar studies became an extraordinarily important scientific field in Denmark and a source of international prestige as one of the few branches in which Danish researchers had a decisive edge over other scholars internationally.162 As with natural history described by Pratt, polar studies produced a discourse of expeditions and themselves became their product, so to speak.163
Voyages into the Arctic regions turned into a literary vogue, fashioning what came to be called “polar literature,” which had a wide readership in American and British metropolises and, in the second half of the 19th century, in Scandinavian countries as well.164 Among the polar genres, accounts from ←56 | 57→expeditions described as journeys of discovery and science enjoyed particular popularity.165 Wherever their writers came from, a common feature of such texts was that they tended to inscribe themselves in their respective contemporaneous national discourses and to frame their authors as fulfilling a special mission in the Arctic peripheries for the sake of the worldwide progress of Western knowledge. In this respect, the role of the Royal Geographical Society as “the greatest promoter of travel and exploration” must be mentioned. In spite of its president’s, Sir Clements Markham’s official pronouncements that exploration should preserve the model of “disinterested science plus brave endeavor,” in reality it was most eager to promote the heroism of the explorers who triumphed against an extremely harsh and threatening nature166. As a result, the expedition accounts produced well into 20th century retained their anachronistic character in spite of the new tendencies in Western travel writing that followed and reflected the developments on the international arena167.
American historian Beau Riffenburgh points, however, to a distinctive way in which the Arctic and expeditions were discursivised by the Scandinavian polar explorers and highlights their different understanding of their environment, respect for human life and freedom from constraints of nationalist supremacy.168 These features add up to what can be called a specifically Nordic matrix for representing the Arctic and its inhabitants. In this book, three narratives of such journeys are particularly relevant as important points of reference in examining Rasmussen’s representations of North Greenland and the Inughuit. These depictions include, chronologically, an account of the Umiaq Expedition to Ammassalik on the east coast authored by Danes Gustav Holm and Thomas Vilhelm Garde, entitled Den danske Konebaads-Expedition til Grønlands Østkyst. Populært beskreven (1887, The Danish Umiaq Expedition to the East Coast of Greenland. A popular description); Norwegian Fridtjof Nansen’s ←57 | 58→report from the first successful crossing of Greenland’s icesheet, entitled Paa ski over Grønland. En skildring af den norske Grønlandsekspedition 1888–1889 (1890, the first English edition: The First Crossing of Greenland, 1890); and Norwegian Eivind Astrup’s account of the expedition under the command of Robert Peary and his stay among the Inughuit in the area of Smith Sound, entitled Blandt nordpolens naboer (1895, English edition: With Peary near the Pole, 1898). To keep my argument lucid, I address Rasmussen’s intertextual references to these works in footnotes.
Although each of the three texts is anchored in another national context,169 they were all authored by Scandinavian writers, and they all revolved around pioneering expeditions into as-yet unexplored areas of Greenland (East Greenland, the icesheet, North Greenland) which were launched in the last decades of the 19th century170. As popular editions based on original travel diaries rather than official expedition reports, all three texts exemplify a hybrid genre which interweaves depictions of the journey, elements of a scientific report, a mapping narrative, hunting tales and ethnographic data about the indigenous population encountered along the way. When published, these works won immense popularity, which was largely linked to their affinity with fiction.171 Rasmussen’s direct predecessors, their authors established a particular model of the discursivisation of the Greenlandic Other at the end of
