As She Began. Bruce Wilson

       Introduction

      Adam Young was one of the first “un-American” Americans. Native-born and of German extraction, there was nothing particularly unusual about the man. He was a small farmer in Tryon County, New York, who by thirty years of labour had cleared and cultivated one hundred acres of land. By the time the Revolutionary War broke out in 1775, Young, sixty years old and a pillar of his community, was slipping into a comfortable old age. Although members of his own family, even his own brothers and sisters, supported the revolutionary cause, Adam Young steadfastly declared himself for the king. As a committed British partisan, he gave shelter and provisions to those fleeing from the Revolution and recruited local men for the royalist forces. Young was harassed and vilified by his neighbours because of his loyalty. He was hauled before the Tryon County Committee of Safety and when he refused to take an oath of allegiance to the new republic, he was marched out of New York into Connecticut and flung into prison for eleven months. Scarcely had Young returned home when a rebel mob descended upon him, burning his home, laying waste to his fields and carrying off his stock. But the old man could not be broken. Gathering his few remaining possessions and shouldering his rifle, he trudged off to join the forces of the crown. His wife and younger children, destitute and on the verge of starvation, were forced to walk overland to the British stronghold at Fort Niagara. There they remained until the war had run its bloody course.

      From 1778 to 1782 Young, joined in time by all four of his sons, served his king in a grim war within a war. As a royalist guerilla fighter he participated in a savage civil war which sowed death and destruction in a thousand-mile swath below the Great Lakes. Young and several thousand other Americans who fought for the crown on the northern frontier won their battles, but they were the complete losers when peace came. Their lands were confiscated and harsh new state laws prevented many of them from returning home. The new United States of America set about eradicating every reminder of their existence. Within a generation, it was as though they had never lived.

       Young did not vanish. Exiled from his native land, he finished out his days in the new colony of Upper Canada. There, on the banks of the Grand River, he once again began the arduous task of hacking a farm out of the wilderness. Reviled as a traitor by one nation, Young was a founding father of another. He and those who had stood beside him would be known in Canadian history as the United Empire Loyalists.¹

      Who were the United Empire Loyalists and what did they think and do? We who live in Ontario have compelling reason for trying to fathom them. The first settlers of our province were Loyalists. They founded our first towns and built our first churches and schools. They created the first farms out of the Ontario wilderness. They helped shape our institutions, our laws and our ways of looking at ourselves. They are a major part of our past. We must attempt to understand Adam Young and his contemporaries in order to understand our heritage.

      Later generations of Canadians have often misjudged the Loyalists. The still-prevailing interpretation of them comes from the late nineteenth century, wrought by Canadian nationalists who believed Canada should accept a vigorous role in the affairs of the British Empire. They, not unreasonably, saw the Loyalists as earlier defenders of the unity of the Empire. In tune with the sentiments of their day, however, they also characterized the Loyalists as the epitome of Anglo-Saxondom. They were convinced that the Loyalists were “the very cream of the population of the Thirteen Colonies,” that they were an educated and cultured elite, representing “the learning, the piety, the gentle birth, the wealth and the good citizenship of the British race in America.”²

      Many Canadians today still hold to a variant of this interpretation of the Loyalists. The Loyalists, they believe, were bluebloods and snobs, toadies to the British authorities and ersatz aristocrats who unimaginatively tried to force inappropriate British ways on a new and vigorous North American society. Many Ontarians believe that the Loyalists are of interest only to a few old-established families who trace their pedigrees back to them, that the Loyalists settled in only a few areas and therefore did not greatly affect the overall growth of the province, and that in the main they are best forgotten.

      In fact, the Loyalists were a very mixed group, white, black and red, only a minority of whom were Englishmen. If anything, the Loyalists were more ethnically and religiously diverse than their rebel opponents. They tended to come from the middle and lower rather than the higher strata of society. The Loyalists were not puppets of the British imperial power. Although they believed in a continuing link, few of them accepted that British customs and institutions could be transplanted without modification to North America. In Ontario, they contended as vociferously for forms of local government and land-holding to suit their situation as their opponents to the south had done before the Revolution. Though they established only a handful of communities directly, they exercised an influence all out of proportion to their numbers. They were the founding group in our province; its political, social, religious and economic systems were put in place to meet the needs and desires of those who wished to continue to live under the crown, the Loyalists.

      We owe much to the Loyalists. Without them, there probably would not have been a Canada. Ontario and New Brunswick would have been settled by American frontiersmen. Nova Scotia would still be connected with Great Britain because of its strategic importance. The British would have had no reason to hold on to Prince Edward Island and little incentive to risk much for the French settlement along the St. Lawrence. Cleared out of the lands to the south, Britain would have had no claim to retain the vast lands granted the Hudson’s Bay Company. Canada as we know it would not exist. If we owe our geography to the Loyalists, we also owe to them our political tradition of “evolution” rather then “revolution,” our ideal of steady progression towards constitutional democracy. Likewise, in their diversity and heterogeneity we can find one origin of our “tossed salad” society with its stress on pluralism and tolerance, as opposed to the American “melting pot.” It is indeed time that Ontarians acknowledged the debts they owe to their brave and determined forefathers, the Loyalists.