TMJ Disorders and Orofacial Pain. Axel Bumann

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу TMJ Disorders and Orofacial Pain - Axel Bumann страница 23

TMJ Disorders and Orofacial Pain - Axel Bumann Color Atlas of Dental Medicine

Скачать книгу

alt="image"/>

       95 Attachment areas of the lateral pterygoid muscle on the condyle

      From Moritz and Ewers 1987. In agreement with numerous other studies, the upper head always inserts on the condyle (1), and in 60% of joints it also inserts into the anteromedial portion of the disk-capsule complex (gray). The lower head always inserts into the pterygoid fovea (2). An overly strong upper head cannot by itself displace the disk anteriorly.

image

       96 Lateral pterygoid muscles in the horizontal plane

      Left: Diagram showing the angulation of the lateral pterygoid muscle to the midsagtttal plane (modified from Christiansen et al. 1988). With the jaws closed, the angle averages 39Q and ranges from 22Q to 52Q. In protrusion the origin and insertion come closer together and the angle becomes greater (Okeson 1998).

      Right: MRI showing the lateral pterygoid muscles (1) in the horizontal plane.

      The tendons of the muscles of mastication attach to bone by means of special insertion structures (Goss 1940, Long 1947, Symons 1954. Cooper and Misol 1970, Chong and Evans 1982). A fundamental distinction must be made between periosteal-diaphyseal insertions (Biermann 1957) and chondral-apophyseal insertions (Knese and Biermann 1958). A periosteal-diaphyseal insertion may be flat or circumscribed. The structural makeup of an insertion should be such that it can equalize the different moduli of elasticity of the tissues. Pathological changes in these areas bring about the clinical picture of insertion tenopathy (Becker and Krahl 1978, Tillmann and Thomas 1982). In the extremities there is a direct relationship between the mode of osteogenesis in the region and the histological makeup of the tendon attachment structures (Evans et al. 1991). This type of relationship has not been demonstrated in the masticatory structures. Insertion tenopathies occur primarily in chondral-apophyseal insertion structures. It has been suggested that the cause lies in a disturbed collagen synthesis combined with a low content of glycosaminoglycans in the fibrocartilaginous tissue (Hems 1995).

image

       97 Muscle origins and insertions on the side of the skull

      left: Schematic drawing showing the origins and insertions of the masseter and temporal muscles. Both muscles have periosteal and cartilaginous areas of insertion.

      Right: Histological preparation of the insertion of the tendon of the temporal muscle. The tendon inserts on the coronoid process by means of cartilaginous structural elements (arrows).

image

       98 Muscle origins and insertions on the medial surface of the mandible

      Left: Schematic drawing of the origins and insertions of lateral and medial pterygoid muscles and the mylohyoid muscle. Except for the medial pterygoid, the insertions of all these muscles are entirely periosteal.

      Right: Histological preparation of the insertion of the lateral pterygoid muscle in the pterygoid fovea. The insertion is entirely periosteal (arrows).

image

       99 Muscle origins and insertions on the posterior mental protuberance

      Schematic presentation of the origins and insertions of the geniohyoid, genioglossus, and digastric muscles. In this region there are both cartilaginous and periosteal areas of insertion.

      Right: Histological preparation of the insertion of the digastric muscle. The insertion of this muscle is primarily periosteal, but it does have some regions of cartilaginous insertion. Histology by B. Tillmann (Figs. 97-99, right)

      No chewing muscle contracts in isolation. Every muscle contraction contributes to a resultant force vector that acts upon the mandible, the teeth, and the temporomandibular joint (Hannam 1994). From this it follows that only limited parts of a muscle are active during certain functions. In addition, the mandible is an elastic structure and this property can cause the loading vectors to be completely different depending on the muscle activation and the function at the moment (Korioth et al. 1992). The maximum force that a muscle can develop can be calculated from the dimensionless product of its cross-sectional area with a value of approximately 35 (Weijs and Hillen 1984, Korioth et al. 1992). As a general rule, decompensated muscles exhibit a loading vector in the direction of their contraction. Causes for this can be a muscle hypertonus related to central stimuli or the occlusion, or an inflammation of the bilaminar zone. The pattern for complex activation of the muscles of mastication depends much less upon the available muscle force than upon the direction of the resultant force. A complex pattern of activation, therefore, allows for unconscious improvement of the muscle forces for optimum chewing efficiency (Mao and Osborn 1994).

image

       100 Muscle vectors in the sagittal plane

      Directions of individual force vectors (arrows). The resultant force on the temporomandibular joint is directed anterosuperiorly. The masseter muscle pulls at an angle of approximately 70° to the occlusal plane and the medial pterygoid muscle at an angle of approximately 80” (Weijs and van Spronsen 1992). Individual variations in these orientations amount to only about 10° (Hagiwara et al. 1994). The physiological cross-sectional area of the temporal muscle ranges from 1.8-2.9 cm2 (van Eijden et al. 1996).

image

       101 Muscle vectors in the frontal plane

      Diagram of the force vectors in the frontal plane (redrawn from Hylander 1992). Through the specific arrangement and activation of the temporal (1), masseter (2), and medial pterygoid (3) muscles, the condyles are directed transversely against the articular protuberance. The direction of the force vectors in the frontal plane is not correlated with the transverse dimensions of the facial skeleton (van Spronsen 1993).

image

       102 Example of a loading vector of the lateral pterygoid muscle

      Clinical evidence of a muscle-specific pain in the lateral pterygoid muscle (1) would point to a chronic overloading in the direction of contraction (arrow). The cause could be a centrally stimulated muscle hypertonus or inflammation of the bilaminar zone. In the latter case, the muscle reflexly seeks to relieve pressure on the painful bilaminar zone. Painful decompensation of the lateral pterygoid muscle without lesions in the bilaminar zone has not been observed clinically for a long time.

      The extrinsic tongue musculature includes the styloglossus, genioglossus, and hyoglossus muscles. They connect the body of the tongue to the nearby bone structures to give it its ample mobility within the oral cavity (Thiele et al. 1992).

      The

Скачать книгу