The Iron Heel - The Original Classic Edition. London Jack

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу The Iron Heel - The Original Classic Edition - London Jack страница 8

Автор:
Серия:
Издательство:
The Iron Heel - The Original Classic Edition - London Jack

Скачать книгу

With the introduction of machinery and the factory system in the latter part of the eighteenth century, the great mass of the working people was separated from the land. The old system of labor was broken down. The working people were driven from their villages and herded in factory towns. The mothers and children were put to work at the new machines. Family life ceased. The conditions were frightful. It is a tale of blood."

       "I know, I know," Bishop Morehouse interrupted with an agonized expression on his face. "It was terrible. But it occurred a century and a half ago."

       "And there, a century and a half ago, originated the modern proletariat," Ernest continued. "And the Church ignored it. While a slaughter-house was made of the nation by the capitalist, the Church was dumb. It did not protest, as to-day it does not protest. As Austin Lewis* says, speaking of that time, those to whom the command 'Feed my lambs' had been given, saw those lambs sold into slavery and worked to death without a protest.** The Church was dumb, then, and before I go on I want you either flatly to agree with me or flatly to disagree with me. Was the Church dumb then?"

       * Candidate for Governor of California on the Socialist ticket in the fall election of 1906 Christian Era. An Englishman by birth, a writer of many books on political economy and philosophy, and one of the Socialist leaders of the times.

       ** There is no more horrible page in history than the treatment of the child and women slaves in the English factories in the latter half of the eighteenth century of the Christian Era. In such industrial hells arose some of the proudest fortunes of that day.

       Bishop Morehouse hesitated. Like Dr. Hammerfield, he was unused to this fierce "infighting," as Ernest called it.

       "The history of the eighteenth century is written," Ernest prompted. "If the Church was not dumb, it will be found not dumb in the books."

       "I am afraid the Church was dumb," the Bishop confessed. "And the Church is dumb to-day."

       "There I disagree," said the Bishop.

       Ernest paused, looked at him searchingly, and accepted the challenge.

       "All right," he said. "Let us see. In Chicago there are women who toil all the week for ninety cents. Has the Church protested?" "This is news to me," was the answer. "Ninety cents per week! It is horrible!"

       "Has the Church protested?" Ernest insisted.

       "The Church does not know." The Bishop was struggling hard.

       15

       "Yet the command to the Church was, 'Feed my lambs,'" Ernest sneered. And then, the next moment, "Pardon my sneer, Bishop. But can you wonder that we lose patience with you? When have you protested to your capitalistic congregations at the working

       of children in the Southern cotton mills?* Children, six and seven years of age, working every night at twelve-hour shifts? They never see the blessed sunshine. They die like flies. The dividends are paid out of their blood. And out of the dividends magnificent churches are builded in New England, wherein your kind preaches pleasant platitudes to the sleek, full-bellied recipients of those dividends."

       * Everhard might have drawn a better illustration from the Southern Church's outspoken defence of chattel slavery prior to what is known as the "War of the Rebellion." Several

       such illustrations, culled from the documents of the times, are here appended. In 1835 A.D., the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church resolved that: "slavery is

       recognized in both the Old and the New Testaments, and is not condemned by the authority of God." The Charleston Baptist Association issued the following, in an address, in

       1835 A.D.: "The right of masters to dispose of the time of their slaves has been distinctly recognized by the Creator

       of all things, who is surely at liberty to vest the right of property over any object whomsoever He pleases." The Rev. E. D. Simon, Doctor of Divinity and professor in the Randolph-Macon Methodist College of Virginia, wrote: "Extracts from Holy Writ unequivocally assert the right of property in slaves, together with the usual incidents to

       that right. The right to buy and sell is clearly stated.

       Upon the whole, then, whether we consult the Jewish policy instituted by God himself, or the uniform opinion and practice of mankind in all ages, or the injunctions of the New Testament and the moral law, we are brought to the conclusion that slavery is not immoral. Having established the point that the first African slaves were legally brought into bondage, the right to detain their children in bondage follows as an indispensable consequence. Thus we see that the slavery that exists in America was founded in right."

       It is not at all remarkable that this same note should have been struck by the Church a generation or so later in relation to the defence of capitalistic property. In the

       great museum at Asgard there is a book entitled "Essays in Application," written by Henry van Dyke. The book was published in 1905 of the Christian Era. From what we can

       make out, Van Dyke must have been a churchman. The book is a good example of what Everhard would have called bourgeois thinking. Note the similarity between the utterance of the Charleston Baptist Association quoted above, and the

       following utterance of Van Dyke seventy years later: "The

       Bible teaches that God owns the world. He distributes to

       every man according to His own good pleasure, conformably to general laws."

       "I did not know," the Bishop murmured faintly. His face was pale, and he seemed suffering from nausea. "Then you have not protested?"

       The Bishop shook his head.

       "Then the Church is dumb to-day, as it was in the eighteenth century?"

       16

       The Bishop was silent, and for once Ernest forbore to press the point.

       "And do not forget, whenever a churchman does protest, that he is discharged." "I hardly think that is fair," was the objection.

       "Will you protest?" Ernest demanded.

       "Show me evils, such as you mention, in our own community, and I will protest."

       "I'll show you," Ernest said quietly. "I am at your disposal. I will take you on a journey through hell."

       "And I shall protest." The Bishop straightened himself in his chair, and over his gentle face spread the harshness of the warrior. "The Church shall not be dumb!"

       "You will be discharged," was the warning.

       "I shall prove the contrary," was the retort. "I shall prove, if what you say is so, that the Church has erred through ignorance. And, furthermore, I hold that whatever is horrible in industrial society is due to the ignorance of the capitalist class. It will mend all that is wrong as soon as it receives the message. And this message it shall be the duty of the Church to deliver."

       Ernest laughed. He laughed brutally, and I was driven to the Bishop's defence.

       "Remember," I said, "you see but one side of the shield. There is much good in us, though you give us credit for no good at all. Bishop Morehouse is right. The industrial wrong, terrible as you say it is, is due to ignorance. The divisions of society have become too widely separated."

       "The wild Indian is not so brutal and savage as the capitalist class," he answered; and in that moment I hated

Скачать книгу