Vita. João Biehl
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Vita - João Biehl страница 10
![Vita - João Biehl Vita - João Biehl](/cover_pre667436.jpg)
Seu Bruno spoke from the pulpit: “Brothers, faith in God will make you win over the world. I came here in bad shape. I did the worst things in the world. At sixteen, I left home, and I tried to be free. I was involved with alcohol and drugs. I was destroying myself. I am forty-eight years old. I lost my family. My three children want nothing to do with me. When I began to beg, my friends also left me. Vita was the only door open to me, and here the word of God opened my mind . . . and I began to see that I have value.”
Many of the men who had already passed through the recovery area took over a nearby spot of land, where they built shacks. A slum, known as the village (vila), formed on the outskirts, as if Vita were radiating outward. The economy of the streets persisted there. Although Vita was presented as a rehabilitation center, drugs moved freely between the facility and the village. I was told that criminals used the village as a hideout from the police. And there was a consensus among city officials and medical professionals that nobody actually recovered at Vita. How could they? Vita means life in a dead language. There were rumors that Zé das Drogas and his immediate assistants were embezzling donations, and even talk of a clandestine cemetery in the woods.
For Zé, Vita, despite all its disarray, was “a necessary thing. . . . Someone has to do something.” State and medical institutions as well as families were complicit in its existence, and they continued bringing bodies of all ages to die in Vita. Zé’s rhetoric was filled with outrage. He quoted the Old Testament and made a case for himself as a prophet: “While we are struggling, others are sleeping and not doing anything. One sees so much injustice that there are no words to express it.”
Stories about the tragedies of Vita were heard in millions of households. Much of the charity that kept Vita functioning was channeled through the work of Jandir Luchesi, a state representative and a famous radio talk-show host. With more than twenty local affiliated stations, his “Rádio Rio Grande” reached nearly 50 percent of the province’s population (some nine million people). During his morning show, Luchesi often put abandonados on the air, pleading with and scolding his radio audience: “Does anyone know this person? Who on earth could have done this to him?” Voicing moral indignation over the fate of the abandoned, Luchesi attracted donations of food and clothing while also carrying out his own political campaigns. Yet in spite of this impressive publicity, Vita was visited mostly by crentes (believers), poor volunteers from nearby Pentecostal churches who brought donations and tried to convert the abandoned. There were also sporadic visits by a few health professionals, such as Dr. Eriberto, who spent two hours a week administering donated medications and writing medical reports.
Only a few of the abandoned looked at us as we entered the infirmary. As they moved around or were moved, their bodies seemed passive, most likely an effect of drugs. Still, we thought, they must plan to leave this place. But we were told that when some manage to escape, they return, humiliated, begging to be allowed back. There is no other place for them to go. Who will hear their stories on the radio and “recognize that that is me”?
A middle-aged man was screaming, “Sou capado!” (I am castrated). As we approached, he stretched out his left arm and pretended to inject himself. “Who knows what has happened to him?” a volunteer shrugged. The man kept screaming, “Sou capado, sou capado!” They belong to Vita: simple people who still recollect being fathers, mothers, sons, daughters, uncles, aunts, grandparents—unclaimed lives in terminal desolation. If anthropologist Robert Hertz is right in arguing that the deceased is not only a biological entity but also a “social being grafted upon the physical individual” (1960:77), one wonders what kind of political, economic, medical, and social order could allow such a disposal of the Other, without indicting itself.
During the first day that Torben and I spent in Vita, we came upon a middle-aged woman sitting on the ground; she crouched over a stream of urine, her genitals matted with dust. As we approached, we could see that her head was full of small holes: worms burrowed in the wounds and under the scalp. “Millions of bichinhos [little animals], generated from her own flesh and dirt,” said Oscar, a former drug user, now being trained by Zé to become one of the infirmary’s coordinators. “We tried to clean it.” Torben could not bear to look. Momentarily paralyzed, he kept saying, “It is too much, it is too much.” The reality of Vita had overwhelmed picture-taking, too. This was a socially authorized dying, ordinary and unaccounted for, in which we participated by our gazing, both foreign and native, in our learned indifference and sense of what was intolerable. Yet rather than remaining paralyzed by moral indignation, we felt compelled to address life in Vita and the realpolitik that makes it possible. Not to represent it would equally be a failure.
Marcel Mauss, in his essay “The Physical Effect on the Individual of the Idea of Death Suggested by the Collectivity,” shows that in many supposedly “lower” civilizations, a death that was social in origin, without obvious biological or medical causes, could ravage a person’s mind and body. Once removed from society, people were left to think that they were inexorably headed for death, and many died primarily for this reason. Mauss argues that these fates are uncommon or nonexistent in “our own civilization,” for they depend on institutions and beliefs such as witchcraft and taboos that “have disappeared from the ranks of our society” (1979:38). As we saw in Vita, however, there continues to be a place for death in the contemporary city, which, like Mauss’s “primitive” practices, functions by exclusion, nonrecognition, and abandonment. In the face of increasing economic and biomedical inequality and the breakdown of the family, human bodies are routinely separated from their normal political status and abandoned to the most extreme misfortune, death-in-life.19
Where had this woman come from? What had brought her to this condition?
The police found her on the streets and took her to a hospital that refused to clean her wounds, much less to take her in. So the police brought her to Vita. Before living in a downtown public square, she had had legal residence in the São Paulo Psychiatric Hospital, but she had been released as “cured”—in other words, overmedicated and no longer violent. And before that? No one knew. She had passed through the police, through the hospital, through psychiatric confinement and treatment, through the city’s central spaces—and in the end she was putrefying even before death. It is clear that dying such as hers is constituted in the interaction of state and medical institutions, the public, and the absent family. These institutions and their procedures are symbiotic with Vita: they make death’s job easier. I use the impersonal expression “death’s job” to point out that there is no direct agency or legal responsibility for the dying in Vita.
What happened to this nameless woman was far from an exception—it was part of a pattern. In a corner, hunched over a bed in the women’s room sat Cida, who seemed to be in her early twenties. Diagnosed with AIDS, she had been left at Vita by a social worker from the Conceição Hospital in early 1995. During her early days at Vita, the volunteers began calling her Sida, the Spanish word for AIDS. Later, I was told that they had replaced the “S” in her new name with a “C”—“like in Aparecida, so that people would stop mocking and discriminating against her.” I was surprised to learn that the volunteers believed that Cida and a young man were the only AIDS cases in Vita. Too many of the wasted bodies I saw also had skin lesions and symptoms of tuberculosis. Oscar told me that Cida came from a middle-class family, but that no one ever visited her. She spoke to no one, he said, and sometimes did not eat for three or four days. “We have to leave the food in a bowl in the corridor, and sometimes, when nobody is watching, she comes down from her bed and eats,” explained the volunteer, “like a kitty.”
Here, animal is not a metaphor. As Oscar argued: “Hospitals think