Ecology of North American Freshwater Fishes. Stephen T. Ross Ph. D.

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Ecology of North American Freshwater Fishes - Stephen T. Ross Ph. D. страница 5

Жанр:
Серия:
Издательство:
Ecology of North American Freshwater Fishes - Stephen T. Ross Ph. D.

Скачать книгу

image of North America. http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA03377.

      TWO

      Origin and Derivation of the North American Freshwater Fish Fauna

      CONTENTS

       Assembling a Fauna: Fish Evolution and Plate Tectonics

       A Dynamic Earth

       Ages of North American Fish Families

       Origins of North American Fish Families

       Numerically Dominant Families

       Continental Positions

       Ages and Origins of Major Fish Families

      ASSEMBLING A FAUNA: FISH EVOLUTION AND PLATE TECTONICS

      STUDIES OF FISH DISTRIBUTION and ecology are often initiated by making a series of collections in various aquatic habitats. In doing so, there is a tendency to consider fishes taken in each particular mesohabitat, such as a pond, lake shore, or stream riffle, to be part of a natural assemblage developed as a unit over evolutionary and ecological time through the interaction of local processes. However, even discounting the recent major role of humans in introducing fishes outside of their natural ranges, this assumption that species in the assemblage share a long history of coexistence may not be valid. As pointed out by Brooks and McLennan (1991), Matthews (1998), and others, in addition to local determinism in shaping assemblage composition, contemporary species assemblages may also be due to the association of the species’ ancestors in that particular geographic region, or the species may have evolved within different assemblages and one or more entered the modern assemblage through dispersal.

      For instance, among the resident species in the diverse (43 species) fish assemblage of the Piney Creek watershed of Arkansas, some species have affinities with faunas to the northeast, others to the east, and yet others to the southeast (Matthews 1998). This suggests that a more realistic view is that assemblages are composed of a mixture of species that have different origins and ages, and have been interacting for widely different periods of time. Of course, this situation is now made even more extreme by the rapid and widespread introduction of nonnative species (Courtenay et al. 1986; Fuller et al. 1999) and the resulting homogenization of faunas (Rahel 2000, 2002; Olden and Poff 2003). This chapter deals with the initial largescale filters affecting the origin of the North American fish fauna (see figure in Part 1).

      FIGURE 2.1. Paleozoic and Mesozoic landmarks in fish evolution. Based on Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Nelson (2006), and Helfman et al. (2009).

      Fish evolution began in the early Paleozoic Period in the late Cambrian or early Ordovician, approximately 500–470 million years ago (mya) (dating of geologic time periods follows Walker and Geissman 2009). During the Silurian and Devonian (444 to 359 mya), there was widespread radiation of both jawless and jawed fish lineages (Figure 2.1). Because of this, the Devonian is often referred to as the Age of Fishes. By the close of the Paleozoic, approximately 250 mya, body forms had evolved that differed very little from those living today (Moy-Thomas and Miles 1971). Modern bony fishes (fishes in the division Teleostei) appeared in the lower Mesozoic (middle or late Triassic, 245–202 mya), and representative forms of most major groups (i.e., orders or divisions) of modern fishes were present at least by the middle Mesozoic (Jurassic, 202–145 mya [Figure 2.1]) (Nelson 2006; Helfman et al. 2009). In fact, almost half of the currently recognized orders of teleostean fishes have fossil records that reach to the Cretaceous Period of the Mesozoic, some 145 to 65 mya (Figure 2.1) (Helfman et al. 2009). Consequently, given the great age of many of the major fish lineages, any understanding of fish biogeography requires looking at a broad slice of the earth’s dynamic geologic history.

      A Dynamic Earth

      During the Carboniferous Period of the late Paleozoic, a time of active radiation in fishes, precursors to the present-day continents collided to form the single large, but highly dynamic and ephemeral, landmass of Pangea (Figure 2.2; Box 2.1). Although subsequently reworked by geological processes such as uplift and erosion, Pangean geography included familiar elements, including an ancestral Mississippi River in central Pangea that flowed through a gap bounded by the Southern Appalachian Mountains and the Ouachita Mountains (Redfern 2001). The process of mountain building (orogeny) that formed the Ouachita and Alleghenian-Appalachian ranges was driven by the collision of the supercontinents Laurasia and Gondwana along the region now recognized as the Mississippi Embayment, as one of the final stages in the assembly of Pangea (Redfern 2001). During the maximum extent of Pangea, what is now the eastern continental margin of North America was adjacent to northwestern Africa and the northeastern region of North America abutted Western Europe (Figure 2.2). Pangea gradually began to break up during the middle Jurassic (176–161 mya) with the intrusion of the central Atlantic Ocean between the northern (Laurasia) and southern (Gondwana) landmasses (Torsvik and Van der Voo 2002). Continued rifting, especially through the late Jurassic to middle Tertiary, resulted in the present-day arrangement of continents (Cracraft 1974; Briggs 1987; Hocutt 1987). Because forms ancestral to most modern fish lineages (but generally not modern orders or families) were present prior to the breakup of Pangea, the subsequent movements of tectonic plates and their associated faunas were primary factors in the formation of fish assemblage composition (Figure 2.1), although in some cases, phylogenies are too poorly understood or fossil material is lacking to clearly establish an area of origin.

      BOX 2.1 • Plate Tectonics

      The idea that continents change position over time, or drift, is understood today as a scientific fact and is as important to geology and biogeography as evolution is to an understanding of biology and biogeography. However, it was not that long ago that continental drift was quite a controversial issue, in spite of the fact that a quick glance at a world map suggested that continental shapes could be fitted together like a crude jigsaw puzzle—a point recognized as early as 1620 by Francis Bacon (Cattermole 2000). The idea that continents move was proposed early in the twentieth century (1910 and 1912) by Frederick B. Taylor, H. D. Baker, and A. L. Wegener, with the German meteorologist Wegener generally recognized as the father of the modern theory of continental drift (Briggs 1995; Cattermole 2000). However, the reigning view at that time was that the earth’s crust was solid and that crustal movement was therefore not possible, and that former land connections (so-called land bridges) were largely responsible for the movement of many organisms between continents. In fact, my first course in biogeography used the classic text by Darlington (1957) in which the issue of continental drift, although mentioned briefly, was largely discounted. By the late 1950s and 1960s the issue of continental drift was gaining increasing attention, and by 1970 the theory was generally accepted as fact (Cattermole 2000).

      The reasons for the fairly rapid turnaround had to do with advancement in the tools of physical geography, paleontology, and biogeography. The understanding that molten rocks can capture the orientation of the magnetic field at the time that they cool provided important insight into past continental orientations. If continents

Скачать книгу