Special Category. Ruán O’Donnell

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Special Category - Ruán O’Donnell страница 42

Special Category - Ruán O’Donnell

Скачать книгу

to establish common economic and political ground with the conservative Republican presidency of Ronald Reagan in the United States. Yet, ironically, the administration was eventually pressurised by the Irish American into addressing the situation in the Six Counties. The Irish question perennially troubled progressive forces across the Atlantic. Several key legal test cases taken in the USA during Thatcher’s Downing Street years were impacted by the IRA campaign in England. In August 1978, Pete ‘The Para’ McMullen, an ex-British Army paratrooper from Derry who was wanted in England in connection with the IRA incendiary bombing of Claro Barracks, Ripon, Yorkshire on 26 March 1974, defeated efforts to extradite him to Britain from San Francisco, California. He had entered the country on a false passport in April 1978 following a stint in Portloaise for IRA membership. His lawyers asserted that there was a precedent for rejecting extradition on the grounds that his offence was political in character. The Californian court concurred, noting Britain’s derogation from international conventions arising from the situation in Ireland.235 Any such case in North America, however, distracted attention from the main ‘secondary’ zone of IRA related prison battles: England. By the early 1980s, a wide range of international jurisdictional concerns competed for the finite resources of the non-violent annexes of the Republican Movement worldwide.236

      Among the details supplied to defence lawyers in the McMullen case was material collated by Paul O’Dwyer highlighting the ‘brutal assault’ on Fr. Pat Fell and hunger strike deaths of Michael Gaughan and Frank Stagg in English prisons in 1974–76.237 When the definitive ruling on McMullen was given by the District Court of San Francisco on 9 May 1979, it was reported that the case was ‘the first time that evidence has been admitted in an American Court concerning the jail conditions and the brutal treatment inflicted on the eighty-odd Irish prisoners in British jails’. O’Dwyer persuasively argued that extradition to Great Britain would be ‘in contravention of the “cruel and inhuman” provisions of the United States Constitution’.238 American focus on England competed with news from the much more violent Six Counties, yet was stimulated by such events as the annual National Graves Association Field Day at Gaelic Park in the Bronx, New York. Manager J.K. O’Donnell had hosted fundraisers for supporters of IRA prisoners in Ireland and England since the early 1950s in which the Irish Freedom Committee, Irish Republican Aid Committee, Irish Northern Aid and other bodies had generated substantial income. The 24 June 1979 gathering in the south Bronx was dedicated to fundraising for a memorial to the ‘trinity of Mayo martyrs – Sean McNeela, Michael Gaughan and Frank Stagg, who died on hunger strike in Irish and English jails to secure political treatment and a measure of human dignity’.239 Their deaths were annually observed, due in no small part to the common Mayo origins of leading New York lawyers Paul O’Dwyer and Frank Durkan, as well as their occasional client, IRA gunrunner George Harrison.240 Tom Regan of the Clan na Gael descended Terence MacSwiney Club in Jenkintown, Philadelphia, was also a veteran of the War of Independence-era Mayo IRA.241 In Cleveland, Ohio, another major Mayo emigrant destination, left wing INA leader Jack Kilroy hailed from a family which numbered 1940s IRA hunger striker Sean McNeela.242

      Parkhurst, 22–24 March 1979

      The Parkhurst protest began on the evening of 22 March 1979 when Sean Kinsella, Martin Coughlan, Gerry Small and Eddie Byrne got onto the roof of D Wing along with one non-political prisoner. Expert roof saboteur Roy Walsh, a tiler by trade, could not participate by virtue of being closely confined in the Punishment Block, although the attack by breaking through a skylight had been carefully planned. The men used a purpose-built ladder to get into position and caused extensive damage by stripping off tiles and hurling them to the ground.243 Walsh had advised on an efficient methodology of loosening entire rows of tiles which had not been properly nailed in position and drilling holes in those that were well embedded to maximize the cost and effort of replacement.244 Mick Sheehan had helped construct the ladder in the prison’s engineering workshop and reported sick on the morning of the protest in order to be in position to provide those heading for the roof with blankets and food.245 They acted to raise publicity on the conditions in H-Blocks, as well as the use of long-term solitary confinement against comrades in England.246 Mainstream news reports covered a secondary purpose of highlighting ongoing frustration at the poor quality of meals supplied in Parkhurst, an issue which had led to periodic bouts of fasting by hundreds of men since December 1978. The IRA contingent in Parkhurst were aware that this aspect of the protest ‘went down, very, very well with the other prisoners’, some of whom they assisted with private and legal correspondence.247 The republicans had also mounted seven-day fasts in support of repatriation and political status in February and November 1978.248

      On 11 March 1979, the Republican Movement cited British Government statistics to claim 360 adherents were ‘on the blanket’ in Long Kesh while thirty-eight female members participated in Armagh Jail. Six prisoners in England were explicitly identified: Tony Cunningham, Liam Baker, Busty Cunningham and Tipp Guilfoyle in Albany, Mick Murray in Wormwood Scrubs and Punter Bennett in Strangeways, Manchester.249 Tony Cunningham had lost close to 50 per cent of his bodyweight since being imprisoned for IRA activities in the Greater London area.250 If the Parkhurst solidarity stunt was not as well noted as the ‘token protest’ of remand prisoners in Crumlin Road Prison, the incident, nonetheless, received press coverage.251 In a gesture not calculated to assuage the concerns of the Home Office, Sr. Sarah Clarke, banned from entering the Dispersal System, was observed outside the complex ‘waving up’ at the IRA men.252

      In keeping with past rooftop occupations, the Parkhurst IRA men unfurled banners referencing the major issues they wished to publicize. Two adjacent wings were immediately evacuated, giving lie to an unconvincing staff statement which claimed that the general body of the prisoners were unsympathetic.253 In fact, approximately 100 prisoners refused meals in order to peaceably convey their support.254 Walsh was adept at traversing and deconstructing slated rooftops. His advice and rudimentary training in sabotage techniques increased the efficacy of IRA roof invasions. The protesters ceased hurling slates to the ground at midnight but resumed their systematic destruction at 8.00 a.m. on 23 March. Power hoses were used in an ineffectual bid to dislodge or inhibit the men. When the group believed they had taken the action as far as practicable they surrendered on 24 March.255 A stark official digest published in July 1980 purposefully concealed the agency of the IRA, if not the seriousness of the episode: ‘One major demonstration at Parkhurst prison lasted three days and involved five prisoners who caused £50,000 worth of damage and rendered two wings of the prison unfit for habitation’.256 The intact C Wing, hitherto used for Dr. Cooper’s controversial experimental programme for prisoners with psychiatric issues, had to be pressed into service to house the maximum-security population. Improved sanitary facilities, not least showers, were acquired in consequence by those relocated from the antiquated and partially destroyed wings. Former occupants of C Wing selected for retention in Parkhurst were transferred into the Hospital Wing where no structured research could be undertaken. Ronnie McCartney, shifted from the Strong Box of Hull Prison, had threatened to resist incarceration in C Wing until its new role was explained.257

      This level of impact, and its Irish political origination, probably explained why the punishments meted out to the five men in 1979 were unusual in character. Although legally entitled to impose terms of cellular or ‘solitary’ confinement, the Board of Visitors elected to instead nominate periods of ‘loss of privileges’ and ‘non-associative labour’. This was tantamount to solitary confinement given that the 120 days spent in the Punishment Block did not technically constitute the traditional sanction. It was assumed by republicans that this represented a new degree of guile in the administration of punishment. Tellingly, the only non-political prisoner involved received just twenty-eight days, whereas the IRA men each lost 112 days’ remission.258 Boards retained much discretion and the Home Office claimed to have ‘urged’ rather than instructed compliance with revised regulations in 1977.259 Sheehan’s role was not exposed but he was quickly shifted to Wormwood Scrubs to spend seven and a half months in solitary.260

      Reception staff at Parkhurst exacted a minor measure of revenge on Walsh on 3 April 1979 by seizing the vast majority of his record collection during his transfer into Wormwood Scrubs. He repaid their malign attention by initiating a further set of official correspondence

Скачать книгу