Best Practices at Tier 1 [Secondary]. Gayle Gregory
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Best Practices at Tier 1 [Secondary] - Gayle Gregory страница 14
![Best Practices at Tier 1 [Secondary] - Gayle Gregory Best Practices at Tier 1 [Secondary] - Gayle Gregory](/cover_pre679455.jpg)
Educators also can help students find meaning in new material by engaging a number of their senses in the learning experience. Of the five acute senses—hearing, vision, touch, scent, and taste—educators often only engage the first two in the classroom. Vision is a great attention-getter and is far more powerful than hearing, as students often tune out the teacher’s voice (Sousa & Tomlinson, 2001). Nevertheless, most classroom teachers try to gain and keep their students’ attention through teacher talk. Richard Mayer (2010), a psychology professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara, indicates that students learn better from multisensory teaching than from learning that engages only one sensory modality.
Mayer is not alone in these findings. James Medina (2008), developmental molecular biologist and affiliate professor of bioengineering at the University of Washington School of Medicine, shows that memory is more accurate and retained longer when learning is multisensory. According to his studies, classrooms that provide sensory-enriched environments contribute to increased dendritic growth. When students engage in multiple rehearsals and practice using their brain’s visual, auditory, and kinesthetic pathways, they actually strengthen the connections between the brain’s dendritic cells and increase the efficiency of recall and use of information (Medina, 2008).
Learning also becomes more familiar and engaging when it has relevance. Students respond better to real-world situations, examples, and artifacts. Students don’t always find reading information in a textbook interesting and stimulating. Here are some other simple techniques to make learning more relevant for students.
In essence, the brain strives to make sense of the world and seeks to understand. The brain has a natural innate seeking system, an emotional system that causes us to be curious and explore to find what we need (Panksepp, 1998). Rita Smilkstein (2003) suggests that learning is an innate human need that drives us all to be curious and seek out information about our world. As we have seen, humans also respond to novelty, interest, and experiences, and these types of stimulation contribute to the growth of the brain’s dendrites (Diamond & Hopson, 1998). Dendrites are branch-like extensions in a brain cell that receive messages from the axon of another neuron. As students learn, dendrites connect to create a larger network. Multiple rehearsals and practice using visual, auditory, and kinesthetic pathways strengthen these connections and cause myelination—a thickening of the connections that increases the efficiency of recall and ease of use (Medina, 2008). By providing a strong foundation of a new concept or skill, we are creating new dendrites—or pathways—to higher levels of learning. Helping students see relevance, usefulness, and the real-world applications of what they are learning increases engagement and offers purpose for the brain—and, thus, is fundamental to creating a brain-friendly learning environment.
Giving Students More Ownership of Their Learning
As the examples we’ve explored in this chapter indicate, activity and participation, rather than just passive participation in the educational experience, encourage student learning. One powerful technique for actively engaging students in the learning experience is by giving them more ownership over it. The work of theorists John Dewey (1938), Jean Piaget (1997), and Lev Vygotsky (1978), fundamentally the fathers of student-focused learning, enlightens us on how children learn best. As they identify, student-centered responsibility is an approach to curriculum planning that takes into account students’ interests, learning preferences, and abilities. It is rooted in the constructive principles of learning whereby students take ownership and have choices about what, how, and why they are learning. This approach infuses the learning process with problem solving, creative thinking, and critical thinking as it develops students’ metacognitive skills.
Much research and writing have focused on the idea of giving students more responsibility over the content and pace of their learning. J. Scott Armstrong (2012) claims, “Traditional education ignores or suppresses learner responsibility” (p. 2). Self-determination theory also supports why this type of learning works (Deci & Ryan, 2002). This theory suggests that learning is always self-directed or self-determined. If students are allowed to control their learning, it becomes their reward.
Student-centered learning offers numerous benefits. It allows students to study what they are curious about and to achieve curriculum goals. It also enables students to use a variety of strategies to suit their learning preferences and satisfy their social needs for communication, collaboration, and peer support. Student-centered learning also contributes to a supportive and nourishing classroom environment by:
If students can see themselves in the curriculum, recognize its relevance to their lives, and feel like they have some input into what and how they will learn, they generally feel less stressed and more committed, thus freeing the brain to be alert and engaged. In chapter 4 (page 79), we’ll discuss supporting student-centered learning in a powerful core curriculum.
Promoting a Growth Mindset
In her popular book Mindset: The New Psychology of Success, Stanford University psychologist Carol Dweck (2006) shares her theory of mindset. People have one of two mental predispositions toward intelligence: