Dreamers of a New Day. Sheila Rowbotham
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Dreamers of a New Day - Sheila Rowbotham страница 10
![Dreamers of a New Day - Sheila Rowbotham Dreamers of a New Day - Sheila Rowbotham](/cover_pre681042.jpg)
Women adventurers’ networks extended over a range of issues and could converge in surprising ways. They also crossed boundaries as individuals took debates across the Atlantic. When Ida Wells-Barnett, the African-American suffragist and anti-lynching campaigner from Mississippi, visited Britain for a lecture tour in 1893, she was hosted by radicals, socialists and feminists. One of her lectures was delivered at the invitation of Annie Besant to the women-only Pioneer Club in London. Wells-Barnett, who was in conflict with Frances Willard because of the latter’s concern to placate white Southern suffrage supporters, found allies in a club which debated feminism, anti-vivisection, anti-vaccination and temperance, and took its name from Whitman’s ‘Pioneers! O Pioneers’. Its members, who included Eleanor Marx Aveling, Dora Montefiore, Olive Schreiner and the ‘new woman’ writer Mona Caird, as well as Besant, assembled in an elegant Mayfair establishment which had formerly been a home of Lord Byron.43
The free thinkers and anarchists were resolutely internationalist. Lillian Harman, the daughter of the editor of Lucifer, came to Britain in 1898. Harman addressed a group which supported free love, the Legitimation League, who regarded her as a heroine because she had been imprisoned for living in a free-love union. Emma Goldman visited Britain several times, while Voltairine de Cleyre went to London to meet the French anarchist Louise Michel in 1897. Rose Witcop, a Jewish East End anarchist, wrote articles for Margaret Sanger’s Woman Rebel and in 1920 spoke with Sanger on birth control in London.44
Personal connections were vital in communicating ideas. Harriot Stanton Blatch, daughter of the famous American radical feminist Elizabeth Stanton, lived in Britain during the late nineteenth century and was associated with the Fabians. When she returned to the US in 1902 she kept up her personal links with British social movements. Mary Beard, later a municipal reformer and historian in the US, also encountered the British women’s suffrage movement while living in Oxford where, in 1899, her husband Charles founded the trade union college Ruskin Hall. Sisterhood was practical when it came to travel. Alice Hamilton, a resident at Hull House who investigated lead poisoning in industry, visited Britain in 1919 and was looked after by Margaret Ashton, a local feminist active in the Women’s Local Government Society. Though feminist international networking was aided by formal organizations, such as the International Alliance of Women and the International League for Peace and Freedom which opposed World War One, these links between individuals were vitally important in disseminating ideas and policies.45
Sexual radicals also networked internationally, informally as well as formally. Stella Browne, a birth control advocate in Britain, met Margaret Sanger after she fled the United States, indicted for giving out information about contraception. After they parted the two women corresponded with one another; in 1916 Browne wrote to the American writer on sex and birth control, Elsie Clews Parsons, urging her to support Sanger.46 Letters complemented direct personal encounters; they were as important as published material in spreading ideas.
Being relatively geographically mobile, middle-class women were able to establish strong direct links, but these personal bonds could also extend to working-class women in socialist and anarchist circles. The ‘Crewe Factory Girl’, Ada Nield Chew, admired the writings of Charlotte Perkins Gilman, which were popular in labour and co-operative circles.47 Labour women also exchanged concepts about organizing with one another. The American trade unionist, Fannia Cohn, told the British Labour Party leader Marion Phillips in 1927:
I am extremely interested that wives of trade unionists should have an organization through which they can function just as well as middle-class women, business and professional women function through their organizations. Women of the middle class have excellent organizations in the United States and they are such a power in our social life that no political party or leader can afford to ignore them.48
The adventurers’ inventiveness was sustained by the dynamic networks through which they organized. Ideas passed back and forth between clusters of women, interweaving, conflicting and constantly moving. Not only were they thinking in action amidst flux, but affiliations to radical and reforming organizations or networks could be extremely fluid. Individuals often straddled several causes at once, and women shifted their points of view over a lifetime. Initially anti-suffrage, Beatrice Webb changed her mind in the 1900s. The British anarchist Charlotte Wilson’s trajectory is an extreme example of theoretical and organizational catholicism. In the mid-1880s she took part in the self-consciously ‘advanced’ discussions of the London-based Men and Women’s Club about sex and society, and was a member of a group around the Russian revolutionary émigré Stepniak, the Society of the Friends of Russian Freedom. She quickly gravitated to the Marxist Social Democratic Federation and then to the Fabian Society, where she proceeded to organize her anarchist faction. In 1885 she helped to start the first British anarchist paper, the Anarchist, which was associated with the American Benjamin Tucker’s Boston-based individualist anarchist paper Liberty. The following year she was editing the anarchist-communist journal Freedom with Kropotkin. Withdrawing from politics in the 1890s, Wilson popped up again with a new political persona during the 1900s, joining the Women’s Local Government Society along with a suffrage organization called the Women’s Freedom League, as well as the research group, the Women’s Industrial Council. She was back with the Fabians in 1908 helping to found the Fabian Women’s Group.49
Charlotte Wilson was unusual, but not unique. Other adventurers moved between movements, assimilated apparently contrary influences and shifted their views. Annie Besant was radicalized by free thought, later working with both the Marxist Social Democratic Federation (SDF) and the Fabians. In 1893 she converted to the spiritual philosophy of Theosophy, spending many years in India where she supported the Nationalist movement. Another ‘SDFer’ and feminist, Dora Montefiore, was at the same time a Theosophist and a member of the Pioneer Club, the Women’s Local Government Society and the suffrage movement.50
Differing generations of women adventurers were affected by the prevailing preoccupations of their era. In the early 1900s the fascination with surveying and mapping which had emerged in reform circles in the late nineteenth century persisted, but it was accompanied by an intense preoccupation with scrutinizing oneself. Elsie Clews Parsons, who had worked with the settlement leader Mary Kingsbury Simkhovitch, was also influenced by the anthropologist Franz Boas’s emphasis on ethnography. Observing others with a camera-eye was not such a big step from treating oneself as a document, and this is exactly what Parsons did in a series of intimate journals in which she examined her personal relationships.51 She was indicative of a new impatient mood. In the early twentieth century an advance guard of ‘modern’ women were prepared to defy the sexual taboos which the older generation had, on the whole, negotiated warily.
In 1914 the creator of the Greenwich Village Heterodoxy Club, Marie Jenny Howe, writing in the avant-garde journal New Review, sought to accommodate the inner and outer dimensions of women’s experience by linking political, economic, cultural and psychological transformations:
Feminism is woman’s struggle for freedom. Its political phase is women’s wish to vote. Its economic phase is woman’s revaluation of outgrown customs and standards . . . Feminism means more than a changed world. It means a changed psychology, the creation of a new consciousness.52
In the 1880s the members of the London Men and Women’s Club had struggled over how to speak about