Management Ethics A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Management Ethics A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 8
<--- Score
101. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
102. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
103. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
104. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
105. What are the core elements of the Management ethics business case?
<--- Score
106. Have all basic functions of Management ethics been defined?
<--- Score
107. How does the Management ethics manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
108. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
109. What is the definition of Management ethics excellence?
<--- Score
110. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
111. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Management ethics brings?
<--- Score
112. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
113. Is there a clear Management ethics case definition?
<--- Score
114. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
115. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Management ethics goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
116. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
117. What is in scope?
<--- Score
118. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
119. Has the Management ethics work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
120. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
121. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
122. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
123. Will team members regularly document their Management ethics work?
<--- Score
124. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
125. Is there a critical path to deliver Management ethics results?
<--- Score
126. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
127. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
128. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
129. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
130. Who approved the Management ethics scope?
<--- Score
131. Will a Management ethics production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
132. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Management ethics results are met?
<--- Score
133. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
134. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Management ethics Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
2. How can a Management ethics test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
3. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
4. What are the costs of delaying Management