Team Member Status Report: Robot Simulations217
3.2 Change Request: Robot Simulations219
3.3 Change Log: Robot Simulations221
3.4 Decision Log: Robot Simulations223
3.5 Quality Audit: Robot Simulations225
3.6 Team Directory: Robot Simulations227
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Robot Simulations229
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Robot Simulations231
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Robot Simulations233
3.10 Issue Log: Robot Simulations235
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Robot Simulations237
4.1 Project Performance Report: Robot Simulations239
4.2 Variance Analysis: Robot Simulations241
4.3 Earned Value Status: Robot Simulations243
4.4 Risk Audit: Robot Simulations245
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Robot Simulations247
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Robot Simulations249
5.0 Closing Process Group: Robot Simulations251
5.1 Procurement Audit: Robot Simulations253
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Robot Simulations256
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Robot Simulations258
5.4 Lessons Learned: Robot Simulations260
Index262
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
2. Think about the people you identified for your Robot simulations project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
3. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
4. How do you recognize an Robot simulations objection?
<--- Score
5. What would happen if Robot simulations weren’t done?
<--- Score
6. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
7. What is the extent or complexity of the Robot simulations problem?
<--- Score
8. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
9. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
10. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
11. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
12. Is it needed?
<--- Score
13. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
14. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
15. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
16. Do you recognize Robot simulations achievements?
<--- Score
17. What vendors make products that address the Robot simulations needs?
<--- Score
18. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Robot simulations project?
<--- Score
19. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
20. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
21. When a Robot simulations manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
22. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Robot simulations delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
23. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
24. Does your organization need more Robot simulations education?
<--- Score
25. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Robot simulations? In other words, what are the risks, if Robot simulations does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
26. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
27. Are there recognized Robot simulations problems?
<--- Score
28. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
29. As a sponsor, customer or
