Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
101. What was the context?
<--- Score
102. What are the PCB electrical test use cases?
<--- Score
103. How do you manage changes in PCB electrical test requirements?
<--- Score
104. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
105. Do you all define PCB electrical test in the same way?
<--- Score
106. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
107. Is the PCB electrical test scope manageable?
<--- Score
108. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
109. What is the context?
<--- Score
110. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
111. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
112. What are the record-keeping requirements of PCB electrical test activities?
<--- Score
113. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
114. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
115. What would be the goal or target for a PCB electrical test’s improvement team?
<--- Score
116. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
117. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on PCB electrical test?
<--- Score
118. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
119. Has the direction changed at all during the course of PCB electrical test? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
120. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
121. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
122. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
123. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
124. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
125. How did the PCB electrical test manager receive input to the development of a PCB electrical test improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
126. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
127. Has a PCB electrical test requirement not been met?
<--- Score
128. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
129. How are consistent PCB electrical test definitions important?
<--- Score
130. How do you catch PCB electrical test definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
131. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
132. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
133. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
134. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
135. What PCB electrical test requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
136. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
137. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
138. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
139. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
140. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to PCB electrical test changes?
<--- Score
141. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
142. How can the value of PCB electrical test be defined?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the PCB electrical test Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
