Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
133. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
134. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
135. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
136. What Scientific workflow management system requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
137. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
138. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
139. What was the context?
<--- Score
140. Is there any additional Scientific workflow management system definition of success?
<--- Score
141. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Scientific workflow management system Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
2. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
3. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
4. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?
<--- Score
5. How is the value delivered by Scientific workflow management system being measured?
<--- Score
6. How sensitive must the Scientific workflow management system strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
7. Will Scientific workflow management system have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
8. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
9. What does losing customers cost your organization?
<--- Score
10. How do you verify and validate the Scientific workflow management system data?
<--- Score
11. How will costs be allocated?
<--- Score
12. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
13. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
14. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
15. Who pays the cost?
<--- Score
16. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
17. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?
<--- Score
18. What are the costs of delaying Scientific workflow management system action?
<--- Score
19. What users will be impacted?
<--- Score
20. What is the Scientific workflow management system business impact?
<--- Score
21. How is progress measured?
<--- Score
22. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
23. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
24. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
25. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
26. How do you verify if Scientific workflow management system is built right?
<--- Score
27. How do your measurements capture actionable Scientific workflow management system information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?
<--- Score
28. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
29. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
30.
