SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
106. How have you defined all SAN file system requirements first?
<--- Score
107. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
108. How do you hand over SAN file system context?
<--- Score
109. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
110. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
111. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
112. What SAN file system requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
113. Have all basic functions of SAN file system been defined?
<--- Score
114. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
115. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
116. Is there a critical path to deliver SAN file system results?
<--- Score
117. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that SAN file system brings?
<--- Score
118. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the SAN file system goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
119. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
120. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
121. Is special SAN file system user knowledge required?
<--- Score
122. How can the value of SAN file system be defined?
<--- Score
123. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
124. Is there a SAN file system management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
125. What gets examined?
<--- Score
126. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
127. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
128. Is the SAN file system scope manageable?
<--- Score
129. How do you catch SAN file system definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
130. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the SAN file system Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
2. What are your operating costs?
<--- Score
3. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
4. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
5. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
6. What is the cost of rework?
<--- Score
7. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
8. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
9. Who pays the cost?
<--- Score
10. How do you measure variability?
<--- Score
11. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
12. Who is involved in verifying compliance?
<--- Score
13. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
14. Are there competing SAN file system priorities?
<---
