What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
11. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
12. Do you all define Stakeholder engagement software in the same way?
<--- Score
13. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Stakeholder engagement software results are met?
<--- Score
14. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
15. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
16. What are the record-keeping requirements of Stakeholder engagement software activities?
<--- Score
17. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Stakeholder engagement software brings?
<--- Score
18. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Stakeholder engagement software goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
19. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
20. How do you gather Stakeholder engagement software requirements?
<--- Score
21. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
22. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
23. Who are the Stakeholder engagement software improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
24. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
25. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
26. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
27. How will the Stakeholder engagement software team and the group measure complete success of Stakeholder engagement software?
<--- Score
28. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
29. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
30. Why are you doing Stakeholder engagement software and what is the scope?
<--- Score
31. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
32. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
33. Who approved the Stakeholder engagement software scope?
<--- Score
34. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
35. Is the scope of Stakeholder engagement software defined?
<--- Score
36. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
37. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
38. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
39. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
40. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
41. What is the context?
<--- Score
42. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
43. Has the Stakeholder engagement software work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
44. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
45. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
46. Who is gathering Stakeholder engagement software information?
<--- Score
47. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
48. What Stakeholder engagement software requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
49. How did the Stakeholder engagement software manager receive input to the development of a Stakeholder engagement software improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
50. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
51. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
