What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Automated search and retrieval system?
<--- Score
46. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
47. What Automated search and retrieval system requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
48. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
49. What would be the goal or target for a Automated search and retrieval system’s improvement team?
<--- Score
50. How have you defined all Automated search and retrieval system requirements first?
<--- Score
51. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
52. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
53. What is the scope of Automated search and retrieval system?
<--- Score
54. Are the Automated search and retrieval system requirements testable?
<--- Score
55. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
56. Is Automated search and retrieval system required?
<--- Score
57. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
58. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
59. What is in scope?
<--- Score
60. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
61. How are consistent Automated search and retrieval system definitions important?
<--- Score
62. Is there a critical path to deliver Automated search and retrieval system results?
<--- Score
63. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
64. When is/was the Automated search and retrieval system start date?
<--- Score
65. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Automated search and retrieval system? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
66. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
67. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
68. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Automated search and retrieval system results are met?
<--- Score
69. Has a Automated search and retrieval system requirement not been met?
<--- Score
70. What is the definition of Automated search and retrieval system excellence?
<--- Score
71. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
72. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
73. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
74. How do you gather Automated search and retrieval system requirements?
<--- Score
75. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
76. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Automated search and retrieval system leverage and how?
<--- Score
77. Is Automated search and retrieval system linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
78. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
79. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
80. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
81. Do you have a Automated search and retrieval system success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
82. What Automated search and retrieval system services do you require?
<--- Score
83. How would you define Automated search and retrieval system leadership?
<--- Score
84. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
85. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
86. How does the Automated search and retrieval system manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
87. Do you all define Automated search and retrieval system in the same way?
<--- Score
88. Have specific policy objectives
