Score
55. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
56. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
57. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
58. Is the scope of Map database management defined?
<--- Score
59. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
60. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
61. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
62. How have you defined all Map database management requirements first?
<--- Score
63. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
64. How will the Map database management team and the group measure complete success of Map database management?
<--- Score
65. Is Map database management linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
66. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
67. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
68. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
69. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Map database management work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
70. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
71. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
72. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Map database management? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
73. What is the scope of the Map database management effort?
<--- Score
74. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
75. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Map database management results are met?
<--- Score
76. When is/was the Map database management start date?
<--- Score
77. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
78. Is special Map database management user knowledge required?
<--- Score
79. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
80. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
81. Do you all define Map database management in the same way?
<--- Score
82. What are (control) requirements for Map database management Information?
<--- Score
83. Are the Map database management requirements testable?
<--- Score
84. What was the context?
<--- Score
85. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
86. How do you think the partners involved in Map database management would have defined success?
<--- Score
87. Have all basic functions of Map database management been defined?
<--- Score
88. Who approved the Map database management scope?
<--- Score
89. What is the scope of Map database management?
<--- Score
90. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
91. What Map database management services do you require?
<--- Score
92. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
93. Is there a clear Map database management case definition?
<--- Score
94. Is there a critical path to deliver Map database management results?
<--- Score
95. Is Map database management required?
<--- Score
96. What is the scope of the Map database management work?
<--- Score
97. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
98. Is the Map database management scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
99.
