What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
96. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
97. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
98. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
99. How do you catch Geospatial intelligence definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
100. Do you all define Geospatial intelligence in the same way?
<--- Score
101. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
102. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
103. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
104. What gets examined?
<--- Score
105. Is Geospatial intelligence currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
106. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
107. What is the scope of the Geospatial intelligence effort?
<--- Score
108. Are the Geospatial intelligence requirements complete?
<--- Score
109. Is there a Geospatial intelligence management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
110. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
111. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
112. What sources do you use to gather information for a Geospatial intelligence study?
<--- Score
113. Are accountability and ownership for Geospatial intelligence clearly defined?
<--- Score
114. How do you manage changes in Geospatial intelligence requirements?
<--- Score
115. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Geospatial intelligence?
<--- Score
116. What was the context?
<--- Score
117. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
118. How have you defined all Geospatial intelligence requirements first?
<--- Score
119. What are the Geospatial intelligence use cases?
<--- Score
120. Is the scope of Geospatial intelligence defined?
<--- Score
121. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
122. What would be the goal or target for a Geospatial intelligence’s improvement team?
<--- Score
123. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
124. What is the definition of Geospatial intelligence excellence?
<--- Score
125. How do you gather Geospatial intelligence requirements?
<--- Score
126. Is the Geospatial intelligence scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
127. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
128. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
129. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Geospatial intelligence work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
130. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
131. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
132. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
133. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Geospatial intelligence Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
