Source Selection Criteria: Technical Reference Model211
2.38 Stakeholder Management Plan: Technical Reference Model213
2.39 Change Management Plan: Technical Reference Model215
3.0 Executing Process Group: Technical Reference Model217
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Technical Reference Model219
3.2 Change Request: Technical Reference Model221
3.3 Change Log: Technical Reference Model223
3.4 Decision Log: Technical Reference Model225
3.5 Quality Audit: Technical Reference Model227
3.6 Team Directory: Technical Reference Model230
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Technical Reference Model232
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Technical Reference Model234
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Technical Reference Model236
3.10 Issue Log: Technical Reference Model238
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Technical Reference Model240
4.1 Project Performance Report: Technical Reference Model242
4.2 Variance Analysis: Technical Reference Model244
4.3 Earned Value Status: Technical Reference Model246
4.4 Risk Audit: Technical Reference Model248
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Technical Reference Model250
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Technical Reference Model252
5.0 Closing Process Group: Technical Reference Model254
5.1 Procurement Audit: Technical Reference Model256
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Technical Reference Model259
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Technical Reference Model261
5.4 Lessons Learned: Technical Reference Model263
Index265
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
2. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
3. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
4. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
5. For your Technical Reference Model project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?
<--- Score
6. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
7. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
8. Does your organization need more Technical Reference Model education?
<--- Score
9. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
10. What does Technical Reference Model success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
11. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
12. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
13. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
14. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
15. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
16. When a Technical Reference Model manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
17. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
18. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
19. What Technical Reference Model coordination do you need?
<--- Score
20. What are your needs in relation to Technical Reference Model skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
21. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
22. Will Technical Reference Model deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
23. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
24. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
25. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
26. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<---
