Score
70. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
71. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
72. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
73. Which information does the Technical Reference Model business case need to include?
<--- Score
74. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
75. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
76. What Technical Reference Model events should you attend?
<--- Score
77. Did you miss any major Technical Reference Model issues?
<--- Score
78. What information do users need?
<--- Score
79. What Technical Reference Model capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
80. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
81. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
82. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Technical Reference Model research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
83. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
84. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
85. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
86. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
87. What would happen if Technical Reference Model weren’t done?
<--- Score
88. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Technical Reference Model as an effective investment?
<--- Score
89. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
90. How do you recognize an Technical Reference Model objection?
<--- Score
91. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Technical Reference Model project?
<--- Score
92. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
93. What situation(s) led to this Technical Reference Model Self Assessment?
<--- Score
94. Are there recognized Technical Reference Model problems?
<--- Score
95. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Technical Reference Model? In other words, what are the risks, if Technical Reference Model does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
96. What vendors make products that address the Technical Reference Model needs?
<--- Score
97. Does Technical Reference Model create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
98. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
99. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Technical Reference Model Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the record-keeping requirements of Technical Reference Model activities?
<--- Score
2. How do you manage unclear Technical Reference Model requirements?
<--- Score
3. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
4. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
5. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
6. Is there a critical path to deliver Technical Reference Model results?
<--- Score
7. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
8. What Technical Reference Model requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
9. What is in the
