How would you define Technical Reference Model leadership?
<--- Score
98. How will the Technical Reference Model team and the group measure complete success of Technical Reference Model?
<--- Score
99. Is the scope of Technical Reference Model defined?
<--- Score
100. How are consistent Technical Reference Model definitions important?
<--- Score
101. How did the Technical Reference Model manager receive input to the development of a Technical Reference Model improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
102. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
103. Have all basic functions of Technical Reference Model been defined?
<--- Score
104. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
105. Will a Technical Reference Model production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
106. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
107. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
108. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
109. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
110. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
111. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
112. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
113. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
114. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
115. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
116. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
117. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Technical Reference Model brings?
<--- Score
118. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
119. Who approved the Technical Reference Model scope?
<--- Score
120. What are the core elements of the Technical Reference Model business case?
<--- Score
121. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
122. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
123. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
124. How do you manage changes in Technical Reference Model requirements?
<--- Score
125. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
126. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
127. Has a Technical Reference Model requirement not been met?
<--- Score
128. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
129. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
130. What are (control) requirements for Technical Reference Model Information?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Technical Reference Model Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are there competing Technical Reference Model priorities?
<--- Score
2. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
3. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
4. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
5. At what cost?
