Plan: Regulatory Processes212
3.0 Executing Process Group: Regulatory Processes214
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Regulatory Processes216
3.2 Change Request: Regulatory Processes218
3.3 Change Log: Regulatory Processes220
3.4 Decision Log: Regulatory Processes222
3.5 Quality Audit: Regulatory Processes224
3.6 Team Directory: Regulatory Processes226
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Regulatory Processes228
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Regulatory Processes230
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Regulatory Processes232
3.10 Issue Log: Regulatory Processes234
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Regulatory Processes236
4.1 Project Performance Report: Regulatory Processes238
4.2 Variance Analysis: Regulatory Processes240
4.3 Earned Value Status: Regulatory Processes242
4.4 Risk Audit: Regulatory Processes244
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Regulatory Processes246
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Regulatory Processes248
5.0 Closing Process Group: Regulatory Processes250
5.1 Procurement Audit: Regulatory Processes252
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Regulatory Processes254
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Regulatory Processes256
5.4 Lessons Learned: Regulatory Processes258
Index260
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
2. Think about the people you identified for your Regulatory processes project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
3. Does your organization need more Regulatory processes education?
<--- Score
4. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
5. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
6. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
7. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Regulatory processes?
<--- Score
8. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
9. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Regulatory processes team, Regulatory processes itself?
<--- Score
10. What information do users need?
<--- Score
11. How do you assess your Regulatory processes workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
12. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Regulatory processes leader?
<--- Score
13. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Regulatory processes will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
14. Are there recognized Regulatory processes problems?
<--- Score
15. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
16. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
17. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
18. Will Regulatory processes deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
19. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
20. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
21. How are the Regulatory processes’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
22. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Regulatory processes? In other words, what are the risks, if Regulatory processes does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
23. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
24. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
25. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
26. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
27. Are there
