Thinking Contemporary Curating. Terry Smith

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Thinking Contemporary Curating - Terry Smith страница 4

Thinking Contemporary Curating - Terry  Smith

Скачать книгу

insistence, break.

      Bruce Nauman, 100 Live and Die, 1984. Neon, 299.7 x 335.6 x 53.3. Collection Benesse Holdings, Inc, Japan

      In these essays, I think alongside the thoughts about curating expressed by a number of curators, looking for traces of the constituents of contemporary curatorial thought, such as those listed a few paragraphs back. These essays are also a set of provocations. They urge curators to complicate thinking about “the contemporary” and to grapple with the challenges of curating contemporaneity.

       1 Steven Rosenbaum, Curation Nation: How to Win in a World Where Consumers are Creators (New York: McGraw Hill, 2010), http://curationnation.org/pages/aboutthebook.

       2 A distinction drawn, for example, by Robert Storr in his essay “Show and Tell,” in Paula Marincola, ed., What Makes a Great Exhibition? (Philadelphia: Philadelphia Exhibitions Initiative, 2006), 14. Museum-based exhibition makers looking for an introductory compendium of sound advice about how to conduct their profession in an honorable fashion will find this an extraordinarily useful essay, as are the contributions by Carlos Basualdo, Lynne Cooke, and others to this anthology.

      3 On-Curating.org 11, no. 11, “Public Issues,” n.d., www.on-curating.org/documents/oncurating_issue_1111.pdf.

       4 Cited in Carolina M. Miranda, “Biting the Hand that Feeds Them,” Art News 10, no. 11 (December 2011): 89.

       5 Avanessian and Skrebowski, “Introduction,” in Armen Avanessian and Luke Skrebowski, eds., Aesthetics and Contemporary Art (Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2011). My grumble about the time-lag remark is occasioned by the fact that some of us have been attempting to theorize contemporaneity critically since the 1990s—in my case, in publications since 2001. It is true, however, that this effort has only been taken up more widely in the past two or three years.

       6 A film by Waterlow’s partner, Julie Darling, entitled A Curator’s Last Will and Testament, was screened in Sydney in April 2012.

       7 My curatorial record is modest and has always been undertaken as part of productive collaborations: The Situation Now: Object or Post-Object Art?, inaugural exhibition, Contemporary Art Society Gallery, Sydney, July 16–August 6, 1971 (with Tony McGillick); Dreams, Fears, and Desires: Aspects of Australian Figurative Painting 1942–62, S. H. Ervin Gallery, Sydney, Newcastle Regional Gallery, and Monash University Art Gallery, Fifth Biennale of Sydney and Power Institute of Fine Arts, University of Sydney, 1984 (with Christine Dixon and Virginia Spate); consultant curator, along with eight others, Global Conceptualism: Points of Origin, Queens Museum of Art, New York, 1999; and consultant to The Achievement of Albert Kahn, University of Michigan Art Gallery, Ann Arbor, 2001. I have also served on the boards of the Museum of Contemporary Art, Sydney, 1989–2000, the Australian Centre for Photography, Sydney, 1996–2000, and the Andy Warhol Museum, Pittsburgh, since 2002.

       8 On Dr. Ursula Hoff, see Sheridan Palmer, Center of the Periphery: Three European Art Historians in Melbourne (Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing, 2008).

      1.

       What is Contemporary Curatorial Thought?

      In a recent essay, “The State of Art History: Contemporary Art,” I track the usage of the term “contemporary” in art discourse during modernity and propose an art-historical hypothesis about contemporary art. I try to set out a framework in which we might identify the precise shape of the act of thought—the affective insight—that contemporary life requires of its art, of the criticism of that art, and of the history of that art: the (necessary, but never sufficient) kernel from which, via many vicissitudes, art must be made and criticism and history written. All kinds of inherited inspirations, medium constraints and possibilities, and many still-vital artistic trajectories remain relevant to such making and writing. Nevertheless, our experience of contemporaneity—of the multiple, various ways of being in time today, contemporaneously—is disposing art, criticism, and history in different ways, and is requiring fresh concepts, mediums, and languages. This is my conclusion:

      Is it possible to be as concise about what contemporaneity—our current condition—is asking of art curatorship? Perhaps it is. If so, the first step is to recognize that the object of contemporary curating is much larger than contemporary art. It must encompass all other art: art from any and every past, current art that is not contemporary, as well as projective, future art. (Some artists, in fact many, envisage art that is not subject to this past-present-future triad. Curators will follow; some are already on this trail.) Like contemporary art, contemporary curating is embroiled in time, but not bound by it; entangled with periodizing urges, but not enslaved to them; committed to space, but of many kinds, actual and virtual; anxious about place, yet thrilled by dispersion’s roller-coaster ride. It does not

Скачать книгу