In the Balance of Power. Omar H. Ali

      African Americans began using a range of tactics in the 1830s, including petitioning, pamphleteering, and violence, in a more concentrated and coordinated fashion than the earlier Revolutionary-era wave of abolitionists. Meanwhile, large slaveholding interests in South Carolina threatened secession from the Union. Southern white planters, through their Democratic Party representatives in Congress, demanded that they be allowed either to nullify the federal tariff or to secede from the Union. Beneath these demands, however, lay deep fears of militant black actions and the possibility of the federal government curtailing white planters’ “freedom” to exploit black labor.⁴⁰ The dramatic actions of two African Americans, David Walker and Nat Turner, the former advocating slave rebellion, the latter carrying out such a rebellion, would compel many Northern white reformers to take a visible stance against slavery. Other black abolitionists understood the importance of building biracial alliances in a white-dominated society and supporting the development of individual white leaders who could act on behalf of the antislavery cause. Toward this end, black abolitionists would help to launch the careers of some of the most notable white abolitionists of the era.⁴¹

      William Lloyd Garrison, who became the best-known white abolitionist of the nineteenth century, established his Boston-based newspaper, the Liberator, in January of 1831 with the support of the free black community. James Vashon, a black barber, provided Garrison critical advances of funding, while James Forten, the black sailmaker and businessman who had been active in the antiemigration black conventions fifteen years earlier, subsidized the Liberator in its earliest stages. African Americans not only became the financial basis of Garrison’s newspaper but helped in its extensive distribution. In 1831, African Americans comprised 400 of the 450 subscribers to the newspaper. In 1833, though the number of white subscribers had grown, African Americans still made up the bulk of the subscription base, comprising more than 60 percent of the Liberator’s distribution list. In April of 1834, 75 percent of the newspaper’s two thousand subscribers were African American.⁴² African Americans provided Garrison with other critical support. In 1833, when he scheduled a trip to England to generate international support for the abolitionist cause in the United States, collections to fund his lobbying were taken up in the free black community, which quickly produced four hundred dollars. When Garrison ran out of money in England, the black Baptist minister Nathaniel Paul advanced two hundred dollars so that he could complete his task.⁴³

      Garrison, like other advocates of moral suasion as the means to end slavery, was shaken by the violence of Nat Turner’s revolt in Virginia, and undertook his own organizing efforts. For Garrison, a newspaper, while important in helping to bring Northern public attention to the plight of slaves, was not enough; a regional organization was required to further the crusade. In January of 1832, Garrison helped to launch the New England Anti-Slavery Society. Within a year, he set out to establish a national body. His efforts culminated in the formation of the American Anti-Slavery Society.⁴⁴ Meeting in Philadelphia in December of 1833, black abolitionists Robert Purvis, James McCrummell, and James G. Barbadoes were among the signers of the society’s “Declaration of Sentiments.” Six African Americans sat on the national body’s board of managers. Garrison and white abolitionist brothers Arthur and Lewis Tappan met with James Forten and other influential black Philadelphians to shape the organization’s mission. The group promised to reach out to “every city, town and village in our land.” They planned on dispatching lecturers, enlisting the press, and circulating antislavery literature. Members sponsored lectures for Northern audiences where former slaves gave firsthand accounts of life under slavery. Over the next weeks and months, African Americans organized dozens of affiliates of the American Anti-Slavery Society, including groups in Ohio, Massachusetts, New York, and Pennsylvania. Hundreds of black and white organizers would travel across the Northeast and West linking affiliated groups together. By 1834, abolitionists had established 60 auxiliary societies; by 1835, 200; by 1838, 1,350; and by 1840, at least 2,000, with nearly 200,000 members. Over two-thirds of the American Anti-Slavery Society’s members were women.⁴⁵

      This second generation of abolitionists, more militant than those of the late eighteenth century, used the term anti-slavery to distinguish themselves from the earlier movement. They also distinguished themselves by drawing many of their white allies from rural areas, such as the small Ohio community where Owen Brown lived. Brown was the father of John Brown, famed in years to come as the symbol of the most militant form of abolitionism: armed insurrection. The call among antislavery activists for immediate emancipation provoked reaction from nearly every part of the white social order in the 1830s. Those who profited directly from the slave-based trade between the North and South were openly hostile toward those who advocated immediate emancipation. However, the antislavery “immediatists,” which included perhaps less than 5 percent of the nation’s total white population, were becoming an increasingly vocal minority, and an intolerable voice to their opponents.⁴⁶

      African Americans calling for immediate emancipation faced not only the ire of the establishment but often exclusion, even hostility, from many white male abolitionists and their organizations. Although the American Anti-Slavery Society encouraged the participation of African Americans, as late as 1836 at least 143 of the nearly 1,000 local white-controlled abolitionist societies excluded African Americans (as well as white women) from their membership. The radical vision of the most progressive abolitionists—that all men and women should be citizens—posed a threat to white domination, including the domination of white male abolitionist leaders in the movement. As the historian Leon Litwack writes, “It was possible to be both ‘antislavery’ and anti-Negro,” as many white abolitionists—male and female—were against slavery but maintained their position as racial superiors.⁴⁷

      African Americans, having followed their own courses of action, had created over fifty black abolitionist groups before the 1830s. Such black organizational independence gained particular significance when African Americans were refused membership in white abolitionist organizations during the 1830s.⁴⁸ Black initiatives nevertheless spurred several leading white abolitionists to follow the lead of the free black community, as in the debate over free black colonization. The white abolitionist Lewis Tappan noted that “it was [African Americans’] united and strenuous opposition to the expatriation scheme that first induced Garrison and others to oppose it.”⁴⁹ Garrison had initially favored free black emigration and colonization, but shifted his position, bringing him closer in line with the views of the free black Northern communities. Toward this end, in 1831 he would attend the National Negro Convention, which was among the first of a number of national black conventions that soon constituted a movement of its own.