iv. “Prevention of damage takes preference over the achievement of interests or fulfilment of needs.”22 This rule lays down the principle that the advantages and the disadvantages of an experiment should be weighed from all angles.
v. “No damage can be put right.”23
vi. “No damage can be put right by a similar or a greater damage.”24 When we damage our health and other interests by our own follies, we have no right to make the animals pay for it by inflicting similar or greater damage on them, such as by doing unnecessary experiments to find remedies for our self-induced ailments.
vii. “Resort to alternatives, when the original becomes undesirable.”25 This rule has a great bearing on the current controversy about the use of alternatives for animals in experiments, such as tissue-culture and other substitutes. Muslim experimentists should take this Juristic Rule seriously. It places a great moral responsibility on them, as well as on Muslim medical students, to find alternatives.
viii. “That which was made permissible for a reason, becomes unpermissible by the absence of that reason.”26
ix. “All false excuses leading to damage should be repudiated.”27
The above two rules leave no excuse for Muslims to remain complacent about the current killings of animals in their millions for their furs, tusks, oils, and various other commodities. The excuse that such things are essential for human needs is no longer valid. Modern technology has produced all these things in synthetic materials and they are easily available all over the world, in some cases at a cheaper price. In olden days, for example, furs and skins were a necessity. Even the Qur’ān mentions the animals as a source of warm clothing. (Qur’ān 16:5). However, this refers only to the skins and furs of domesticated cattle which either die their natural death or are slaughtered for food. There are millions of wild animals which are being killed these days commercially just for their furs and skins, while their carcasses are left to rot. Fourteen centuries ago Islam realised the absurdity of this wasteful and cruel practice and passed laws to stop it in the following Aḥādīth:
“The Holy Prophet Muḥammad(s) prohibited the use of skins of wild animals.”28
“The Holy Prophet(s) forbade the skins of wild animals being used as floor-coverings.”29
“The Holy Prophet(s) said: ‘Do not ride on saddles made of silk or leopard skins.”30
It is important to note that the first Ḥadīth covers all wild animals. The reason why leopard skins have been mentioned specifically could, perhaps, be that the Holy Prophet(s) might have seen someone using a saddle of leopard skin. Similarly, the specific mention of floor-coverings and saddles does not mean that they could be used for other purposes.
Given the practical approach of Islam to human imperfections and inadequacies, as said before, some research on animals and the concomitant surgical operations may yet be justifiable provided that they are carried out without pain and under anaesthetics; provided that the subject animal is put to sleep before it regains consciousness; provided that the animal is not disfigured; provided that it is done honestly and truly for knowledge and not for the promotion of commercial interests; provided that the operations are done by conscientious and qualified scientists; and provided that there is no alternative to it. It is comparatively easier to keep under control professionally qualified scientists and educational institutions, although experience shows that even some of them could be tempted to abuse their professional privilege. In view of the prevailing conditions in this field, a more uncompromising legislation would not be amiss.
According to the spirit and the overall teachings of Islam, causing avoidable pain and suffering to the defenceless and innocent creatures of God is not justifiable under any circumstances. No advantages and no urgency of human needs would justify the kind of calculated violence which is being done these days against animals, especially through international trade of livestock and meat. One of the sayings of the Holy Prophet Muḥammad(s) tells us: “if you must kill, kill without torture”.31 While pronouncing this dictum, he did not name any animal as an exception – not even any noxious or venomous creature, such as scorpions and snakes. People are allowed to kill them only if they become a threat to life or limb; and even then without torture.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.
