The Knowledge of God and the Service of God According to the Teaching of the Reformation. Karl Barth
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу The Knowledge of God and the Service of God According to the Teaching of the Reformation - Karl Barth страница 11
![The Knowledge of God and the Service of God According to the Teaching of the Reformation - Karl Barth The Knowledge of God and the Service of God According to the Teaching of the Reformation - Karl Barth Gifford Lectures](/cover_pre684106.jpg)
And though our words falter when we call Him Lord, yet He Himself has given us the ground and occasion for uttering these faltering words and He has given us the ground and occasion for being perfectly certain of His Lordship in the midst of the uncertainty which is and remains our portion. Moreover, we are aware of His being hidden and therefore of the faltering nature of our words and thus of our uncertainty only by His having made Himself known to us as the one who dwells in majesty, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Thus faith in God’s revelation can in all lowliness of spirit give nothing but a very courageous answer to the question “Who is God?” without thereby ceasing to be fear unto death before the hiddenness of God. It is faith which will confess God as the One Who possesses a name and therefore is a person and therefore is the God with Whom we are very well acquainted. It is faith which holds its ground before God, and in all soberness takes the presence of God into account, consorts with Him, listens and speaks to Him. It is faith which knows God as a child knows its father, or as a brother his brother or even as a man knows himself. There does exist also a speculative optimism which thinks it is very well acquainted with God in nature, in history and in the heart of man. But this optimism has, in principle, not reached the simplicity in which man may have intercourse with God as the God Whom he knows. It has not yet been taught by God Himself that we may really have intercourse with Him, because He has come so near to us. Such optimism is only a human answer to a human question. Something else must be known before we can say God is near us. To believe in the God who is near us and to recognise God’s presence, we must be brought with Israel out of Egypt and must know the grace of Good Friday, Easter and Pentecost, and must have faith.
III
It is necessary to make clear what is contained in the conception “Person” if we intend to speak of God’s personality. The doctrine of the Trinity, assumed in the Confessio Scotica as an indisputable truth, does not mean that in God there are three subjects. What it does say is that from eternity and to eternity God is the Subject, the Person, who establishes Himself and is founded on Himself, the Son on the Father, the Spirit on the Father and the Son. He is thrice named, and thrice truly exists as the One God, the one Subject, the one Person, but the Person who begets Himself, proceeds from Himself and Himself is master of His own existence and essence. As this Subject who is three in one, in virtue of the incomparable freedom and power in which He is what He is, without standing in need of any other being or predicate—as this Person God can and must be free and therefore have dominion over all existence which differs from His existence and over all essence which differs from His essence. Precisely as this Person He is Lord, is above us, the God of majesty, the hidden God.
God is therefore a Person in a way quite different from that in which we are persons. Our relations to others condition what we are. Our existence as persons requires a world around us with the conditions and limitations which such a world imposes. We are not persons possessed of majesty, and therefore we ought not to think that we are, though sometimes we do. Thus God is personal, but personal in an incomprehensible way, in so far as the conception of His personality surpasses all our views of personality. This is so, just because He and He alone is a true, real and genuine person. Were we to overlook this and try to conceive God in our own strength according to our conception of personality, we would make an idol out of God. We will avoid this, if in dealing with the question “Who is God?” we keep to the answer given by God Himself and therefore to God’s revelation and thus to the knowledge of faith.
IV
But it is also necessary to make clear what is contained in the conception “Majesty,” if it is to be applied to God. It is easy to misunderstand the Confession, as if by enumerating a number of attributes such as the eternal, infinite, etc., which are assumed to be perfectly clear, it seeks to offer a universally intelligible philosophy of the Absolute, to which the doctrine of the Trinity is in some amazing way to be attached. On this view the name Father, Son and Holy Spirit is just a special predicate of a subject with which we are already familiar, namely the Absolute. The traditional practice, which goes far back in theology, of speaking first of God’s essence and attributes and only then of the three-in-oneness, has helped to bring about this misunderstanding. But God’s majesty is to be measured just as little by the standard of the human idea of the Absolute as God’s personality is to be measured by the standard of our view of human personality. The human idea of the Absolute, which we are accustomed to think of as identical with God, is the reflection of the world, and in the end the disastrous reflection of human personality. Once again, if we had equated this idea with God, we would have set up the image of an idol. We have not to draw our knowledge of who God is from what we think we know about eternity, infinity, omnipotence and invisibility as conceptions which bound our thought. On the contrary, we have to draw our knowledge of eternity, infinity, omnipotence and invisibility from what we can know about God, from what God has said to us about Himself. If we choose to take the first way or the various ways into which this first way is generally divided—the famous via negationis, the via eminentiae, and via causalitatis—we could as easily conclude with the definition “God is nothing” as with the second one “God is everything” or the third “God is the One in everything.” And with it all, what we have defined, would not be God. On the contrary, we would have defined in one way or another the essence of that which is not God, we would have defined the creature, and in the end, as Ludwig Feuerbach has irrefutably shown, the essence of man himself. If we do not wish to end by really defining ourselves, when we think that we are defining God, we can only take the second way and therefore hold fast to the incomprehensible majesty in which God meets us in His revelation, the majesty of His person as Father, Son and Holy Spirit. His majesty consists in His being the archetypal Person, i.e. truly, really and genuinely a person. As a divine Person, He has freedom over Himself and over all things, as we saw above. But as a Person, in distinction from those images of our imagination, He is One Who knows and wills, Who acts and speaks, Who as an “I” calls me “Thou” and Whom I can call “Thou” in return. This is the true name of God declared by Him Himself, and in it we must seek also the whole mystery of His majesty. Apart from this name it would have to remain completely hidden from us.
THE GLORY OF GOD AND THE GLORY OF MAN
(Art. 1c–2b)
Be whom we confesse and beleve all thingis in hevin and eirth, aswel Visible as Invisible, to have been created, to be reteined in their being, and to be ruled and guyded be his inscrutable Providence, to sik end, as his Eternall Wisdome, Gudnes, and Justice hes appoynted them, to the manifestatioun of his awin glorie.
ART. II
OF THE CREATIOUN OF MAN
We confesse and acknawledge this our GOD to have created man, to wit, our first